RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon RX 7600M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RX 7600M
2023
8 GB GDDR6
10.18

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Radeon RX 7600M by a whopping 254% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking408126
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameNavi 33no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2023 (1 year ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17924608
Boost clock speed2070 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt (50 - 90 Watt TGP)115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate246.4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 7600M and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−233%
70−75
+233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−233%
50−55
+233%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−243%
120−130
+243%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−252%
95−100
+252%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−246%
90−95
+246%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−252%
95−100
+252%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−233%
120−130
+233%
Hitman 3 24−27
−246%
90−95
+246%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−233%
70−75
+233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−241%
75−80
+241%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−233%
70−75
+233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−233%
50−55
+233%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−243%
120−130
+243%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−252%
95−100
+252%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−246%
90−95
+246%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−252%
95−100
+252%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−233%
120−130
+233%
Hitman 3 24−27
−246%
90−95
+246%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−233%
70−75
+233%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−233%
50−55
+233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−241%
75−80
+241%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−233%
70−75
+233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−233%
70−75
+233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−233%
50−55
+233%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−243%
120−130
+243%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−246%
90−95
+246%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−252%
95−100
+252%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−233%
120−130
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−233%
70−75
+233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−233%
50−55
+233%
Hitman 3 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Hitman 3 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.18 36.00
Recency 5 January 2023 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 115 Watt

The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7600M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600M
Radeon RX 7600M
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 19 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.