Radeon RX 7700S vs GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Place in the ranking	114	109
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	18.13	27.50
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	TU104	Navi 33
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)	4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	2048
Core clock speed	1365 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	2500 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	299.5	320.0
Floating-point processing power	9.585 TFLOPS	20.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	192	128
Tensor Cores	384	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	48	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Portable Device Dependent
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.140	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2080 Super Mobile 39.41

RX 7700S 39.85
+1.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2080 Super Mobile 34876

RX 7700S 37918
+8.7%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2080 Super Mobile 24960
+2.9%

RX 7700S 24246

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 2080 Super Mobile 10313
+1%

RX 7700S 10206

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	136 +17.2%	116 −17.2%
1440p	94 +59.3%	59 −59.3%
4K	67 +34%	50 −34%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	80−85 −6%	88 +6%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%
Elden Ring	130−140 −1.4%	140−150 +1.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	104 −1%	100−110 +1%
Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +9.2%	76 −9.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%
Forza Horizon 4	265 +31.2%	202 −31.2%
Metro Exodus	116 +22.1%	95−100 −22.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	121 +55.1%	75−80 −55.1%
Valorant	216 +35%	160−170 −35%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +22.1%	68 −22.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%
Dota 2	142 +59.6%	89 −59.6%
Elden Ring	130−140 −1.4%	140−150 +1.4%
Far Cry 5	96 +47.7%	65 −47.7%
Fortnite	170−180 −0.6%	170−180 +0.6%
Forza Horizon 4	217 +29.9%	167 −29.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	136 +2.3%	133 −2.3%
Metro Exodus	92 −3.3%	95−100 +3.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 −0.5%	200−210 +0.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	66 −18.2%	75−80 +18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140−150 −1.4%	140−150 +1.4%
Valorant	127 −26%	160−170 +26%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80 −31.3%	100−110 +31.3%
Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +62.7%	51 −62.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%
Dota 2	141 +13.7%	120−130 −13.7%
Far Cry 5	95−100 −1%	95−100 +1%
Forza Horizon 4	183 +27.1%	144 −27.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 −0.5%	200−210 +0.5%
Valorant	205 +28.1%	160−170 −28.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	90 +34.3%	67 −34.3%
Elden Ring	80−85 −2.5%	80−85 +2.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	90 +34.3%	67 −34.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	43 +7.5%	40−45 −7.5%
World of Tanks	250−260 −0.8%	250−260 +0.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	78 +6.8%	70−75 −6.8%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −2.5%	40−45 +2.5%
Far Cry 5	120−130 −1.6%	120−130 +1.6%
Forza Horizon 4	137 +48.9%	92 −48.9%
Metro Exodus	90 +4.7%	85−90 −4.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 −1.4%	70−75 +1.4%
Valorant	162 +28.6%	120−130 −28.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Dota 2	97 +42.6%	68 −42.6%
Elden Ring	35−40 −2.6%	35−40 +2.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	97 +42.6%	68 −42.6%
Metro Exodus	35 +6.1%	30−35 −6.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −0.8%	120−130 +0.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	28 +7.7%	24−27 −7.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	97 +42.6%	68 −42.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	48 +2.1%	45−50 −2.1%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
Dota 2	141 +78.5%	75−80 −78.5%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −1.7%	55−60 +1.7%
Fortnite	55−60 −1.8%	55−60 +1.8%
Forza Horizon 4	78 +62.5%	48 −62.5%
Valorant	89 +34.8%	65−70 −34.8%

This is how RTX 2080 Super Mobile and RX 7700S compete in popular games:

RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 17% faster in 1080p
RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 59% faster in 1440p
RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 34% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 78% faster.
in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7700S is 31% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2080 Super Mobile is ahead in 30 tests (48%)
RX 7700S is ahead in 27 tests (43%)
there's a draw in 6 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	39.41	39.85
Recency	2 April 2020	4 January 2023
Chip lithography	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	100 Watt

RX 7700S has a 1.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile and Radeon RX 7700S.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.