Radeon 740M vs RX 7600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7600M and Radeon 740M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 7600M
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 90 Watt
10.25
+23.9%

RX 7600M outperforms 740M by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking443510
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.8538.02
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 33Phoenix
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2023 (2 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792256
Core clock speed1500 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed2410 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate269.940.00
Floating-point processing power17.27 TFLOPS2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs11216
Ray Tracing Cores284

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600M 10.25
+23.9%
Radeon 740M 8.27

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7600M 3940
+23.9%
Radeon 740M 3180

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 7600M 35101
+369%
Radeon 740M 7490

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 7600M 25679
+400%
Radeon 740M 5135

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 7600M 9097
+435%
Radeon 740M 1699

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD82
+290%
21
−290%
1440p35
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
4K23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 83
+453%
14−16
−453%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Counter-Strike 2 74
+363%
16
−363%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Forza Horizon 4 218
+364%
47
−364%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+30%
20−22
−30%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+27.3%
21−24
−27.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+17.4%
21−24
−17.4%
Valorant 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Counter-Strike 2 62
+377%
13
−377%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Dota 2 74
+131%
32
−131%
Far Cry 5 62
+195%
21
−195%
Fortnite 60−65
+22.4%
45−50
−22.4%
Forza Horizon 4 185
+400%
37
−400%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+30%
20−22
−30%
Grand Theft Auto V 111
+283%
27−30
−283%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+27.3%
21−24
−27.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+19.7%
65−70
−19.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+17.4%
21−24
−17.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+24%
24−27
−24%
Valorant 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
World of Tanks 140−150
+18.5%
120−130
−18.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Counter-Strike 2 57
+470%
10
−470%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Dota 2 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+16.7%
35−40
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 157
+423%
30
−423%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+30%
20−22
−30%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+19.7%
65−70
−19.7%
Valorant 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+19.5%
40−45
−19.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
World of Tanks 70−75
+21.7%
60−65
−21.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 37
+19.4%
30−35
−19.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+29.4%
16−18
−29.4%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+35.3%
16−18
−35.3%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Valorant 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Dota 2 21−24
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Fortnite 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Valorant 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%

This is how RX 7600M and Radeon 740M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600M is 290% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600M is 30% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600M is 28% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7600M is 470% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7600M is ahead in 61 test (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.25 8.27
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 15 Watt

RX 7600M has a 23.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 740M, on the other hand, has a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 740M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600M
Radeon RX 7600M
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 27 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 85 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.