Radeon 880M vs RX 7600M XT

Place in the ranking	150	278
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	19.87	92.69
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code name	Navi 33	Strix Point
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	4 January 2023 (2 years ago)	15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	512
Core clock speed	1280 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	2469 MHz	2900 MHz
Number of transistors	13,300 million	34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	316.0	92.80
Floating-point processing power	20.23 TFLOPS	2.97 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	16
TMUs	128	32
Ray Tracing Cores	32	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600M XT 34.55
+71.5%

Radeon 880M 20.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7600M XT 13286
+71.5%

Radeon 880M 7747

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 7600M XT 38039
+174%

Radeon 880M 13892

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 7600M XT 28686
+243%

Radeon 880M 8371

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 7600M XT 155836
+202%

Radeon 880M 51662

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 7600M XT 9555
+218%

Radeon 880M 3006

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	116 +222%	36 −222%
1440p	55 +150%	22 −150%
4K	33 +83.3%	18−20 −83.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	105 +150%	42 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 +82.5%	40−45 −82.5%
Elden Ring	135 +111%	60−65 −111%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +51.6%	60−65 −51.6%
Counter-Strike 2	90 +173%	33 −173%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 +82.5%	40−45 −82.5%
Forza Horizon 4	255 +245%	74 −245%
Metro Exodus	109 +102%	50−55 −102%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 +52.2%	45−50 −52.2%
Valorant	130−140 +70.4%	80−85 −70.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +51.6%	60−65 −51.6%
Counter-Strike 2	82 +228%	25 −228%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 +82.5%	40−45 −82.5%
Dota 2	89 +67.9%	53 −67.9%
Elden Ring	110−120 +85.9%	60−65 −85.9%
Far Cry 5	70 +59.1%	44 −59.1%
Fortnite	150−160 +48.1%	100−110 −48.1%
Forza Horizon 4	208 +230%	63 −230%
Grand Theft Auto V	132 +154%	52 −154%
Metro Exodus	90 +66.7%	50−55 −66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +40.7%	130−140 −40.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 +52.2%	45−50 −52.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +88.9%	60−65 −88.9%
Valorant	130−140 +70.4%	80−85 −70.4%
World of Tanks	270−280 +19.3%	230−240 −19.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +51.6%	60−65 −51.6%
Counter-Strike 2	60 +186%	21 −186%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 +82.5%	40−45 −82.5%
Dota 2	110−120 +72.3%	65−70 −72.3%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +35.8%	65−70 −35.8%
Forza Horizon 4	180 +240%	53 −240%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +40.7%	130−140 −40.7%
Valorant	130−140 +70.4%	80−85 −70.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	70 +218%	22 −218%
Elden Ring	65−70 +103%	30−35 −103%
Grand Theft Auto V	69 +116%	30−35 −116%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +75%	100−105 −75%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +83.3%	18−20 −83.3%
World of Tanks	220−230 +61.3%	130−140 −61.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +61%	40−45 −61%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +73.7%	19 −73.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +83.3%	18−20 −83.3%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +104%	50−55 −104%
Forza Horizon 4	120 +131%	50−55 −131%
Metro Exodus	92 +100%	45−50 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	74 +164%	27−30 −164%
Valorant	100−110 +98.1%	50−55 −98.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1 −1600%	16−18 +1600%
Dota 2	74 +118%	30−35 −118%
Elden Ring	30−35 +107%	14−16 −107%
Grand Theft Auto V	74 +118%	30−35 −118%
Metro Exodus	35 +133%	14−16 −133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +83.3%	60−65 −83.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +69.2%	12−14 −69.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	74 +118%	30−35 −118%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +95%	20−22 −95%
Counter-Strike 2	13 −30.8%	16−18 +30.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
Dota 2	65−70 +85.7%	35−40 −85.7%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +88.5%	24−27 −88.5%
Fortnite	45−50 +95.8%	24−27 −95.8%
Forza Horizon 4	64 +113%	30−33 −113%
Valorant	50−55 +121%	24−27 −121%

This is how RX 7600M XT and Radeon 880M compete in popular games:

RX 7600M XT is 222% faster in 1080p
RX 7600M XT is 150% faster in 1440p
RX 7600M XT is 83% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 7600M XT is 245% faster.
in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 880M is 1600% faster.

All in all, in popular games: