Quadro K2200 vs Radeon RX 7600

Place in performance ranking	83	442
Place by popularity	76	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	37.51	2.90
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022)	Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code name	Navi 33	GM107
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	24 May 2023 (less than a year ago)	22 July 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$269	$395.75
Current price	$352 (1.3x MSRP)	$313 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7600 has 1193% better value for money than Quadro K2200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	640
Core clock speed	1720 MHz	1046 MHz
Boost clock speed	2655 MHz	1124 MHz
Number of transistors	13,300 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	68 Watt
Texture fill rate	339.8	44.96
Floating-point performance	no data	1,439 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	204 mm	202 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	18000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	80.19 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.7	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	+
CUDA	no data	5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600 42.04
+358%

Quadro K2200 9.18

Radeon RX 7600 outperforms Quadro K2200 by 358% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 7600 16272
+358%

Quadro K2200 3552

Radeon RX 7600 outperforms Quadro K2200 by 358% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	144 +380%	30−35 −380%
1440p	74 +363%	16−18 −363%
4K	39 +388%	8−9 −388%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

148

+393%

30−33
−393%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 +421%	14−16 −421%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 +421%	14−16 −421%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +396%	24−27 −396%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +379%	24−27 −379%
Cyberpunk 2077	117 +388%	24−27 −388%
Far Cry 5	183 +423%	35−40 −423%
Far Cry New Dawn	161 +360%	35−40 −360%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +367%	27−30 −367%
Hitman 3	130−140 +396%	27−30 −396%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +406%	18−20 −406%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +386%	14−16 −386%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	181 +417%	35−40 −417%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +381%	16−18 −381%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 +421%	14−16 −421%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 +421%	14−16 −421%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +396%	24−27 −396%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +379%	24−27 −379%
Cyberpunk 2077	100 +376%	21−24 −376%
Far Cry 5	174 +397%	35−40 −397%
Far Cry New Dawn	154 +413%	30−33 −413%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +367%	27−30 −367%
Hitman 3	130−140 +396%	27−30 −396%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +406%	18−20 −406%
Metro Exodus	113 +371%	24−27 −371%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +386%	14−16 −386%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	155 +417%	30−33 −417%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	210 +367%	45−50 −367%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +381%	16−18 −381%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 +421%	14−16 −421%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 +421%	14−16 −421%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +396%	24−27 −396%
Cyberpunk 2077	90 +400%	18−20 −400%
Far Cry 5	163 +366%	35−40 −366%
Far Cry New Dawn	138 +360%	30−33 −360%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +367%	27−30 −367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	123 +413%	24−27 −413%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +381%	16−18 −381%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +407%	14−16 −407%
Hitman 3	80−85 +400%	16−18 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +400%	12−14 −400%
Metro Exodus	65 +364%	14−16 −364%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +386%	7−8 −386%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	89 +394%	18−20 −394%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +360%	10−11 −360%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +370%	10−11 −370%
Battlefield 5	85−90 +383%	18−20 −383%
Cyberpunk 2077	56 +367%	12−14 −367%
Far Cry 5	115 +379%	24−27 −379%
Far Cry New Dawn	118 +392%	24−27 −392%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +394%	18−20 −394%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	86 +378%	18−20 −378%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +388%	8−9 −388%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +388%	8−9 −388%
Hitman 3	40−45 +378%	9−10 −378%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +386%	7−8 −386%
Metro Exodus	38 +375%	8−9 −375%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +450%	4−5 −450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	42 +367%	9−10 −367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	59 +392%	12−14 −392%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +383%	6−7 −383%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +440%	5−6 −440%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +410%	10−11 −410%
Cyberpunk 2077	24 +380%	5−6 −380%
Far Cry 5	57 +375%	12−14 −375%
Far Cry New Dawn	62 +417%	12−14 −417%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +392%	12−14 −392%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +450%	4−5 −450%

This is how RX 7600 and Quadro K2200 compete in popular games:

RX 7600 is 380% faster than Quadro K2200 in 1080p
RX 7600 is 363% faster than Quadro K2200 in 1440p
RX 7600 is 388% faster than Quadro K2200 in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	42.04	9.18
Recency	24 May 2023	22 July 2014
Cost	$269	$395.75
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	68 Watt