GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Radeon RX 6700S

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6700S with GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB, including specs and performance data.

RX 6700S
2022
10 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
38.64
+38.6%

RX 6700S outperforms RTX 3050 6 GB by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking108184
Place by popularitynot in top-10044
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.75
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2020−2022)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 23GA107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)2 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179
Current priceno data$204 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922304
Core clock speed1700 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1890 MHz1470 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate224.0105.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 6700S and GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount10 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s168.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDAno data8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6700S 38.64
+38.6%
RTX 3050 6 GB 27.88

Radeon RX 6700S outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB by 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 6700S 14922
+38.6%
RTX 3050 6 GB 10766

Radeon RX 6700S outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB by 39% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD115
+43.8%
80−85
−43.8%
1440p67
+48.9%
45−50
−48.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+32.4%
65−70
−32.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+32.4%
65−70
−32.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 150−160
+32.7%
113
−32.7%
Battlefield 5 170−180
+37.1%
120−130
−37.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+28.2%
75−80
−28.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+31.3%
99
−31.3%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+31%
80−85
−31%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
+35.4%
95−100
−35.4%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+35.1%
140−150
−35.1%
Hitman 3 130−140
+31.3%
99
−31.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+34.6%
150−160
−34.6%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+35.1%
110−120
−35.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+29%
90−95
−29%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 300−310
+32.2%
227
−32.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+37.6%
109
−37.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+32.4%
65−70
−32.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
+29%
93
−29%
Battlefield 5 170−180
+37.1%
120−130
−37.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+28.2%
75−80
−28.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+35.1%
74
−35.1%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+31%
80−85
−31%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
+35.4%
95−100
−35.4%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+35.1%
140−150
−35.1%
Hitman 3 65−70
+38.3%
47
−38.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+34.6%
150−160
−34.6%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+35.1%
110−120
−35.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+29%
90−95
−29%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 250−260
+36.6%
183
−36.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 190−200
+31.9%
144
−31.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+35.4%
95−100
−35.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+32.4%
65−70
−32.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−105
+26.6%
79
−26.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+28.2%
75−80
−28.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+33.3%
60
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+31%
80−85
−31%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+35.1%
140−150
−35.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+34.6%
150−160
−34.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 210−220
+33.8%
157
−33.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+31%
84
−31%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+35.6%
59
−35.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+29%
90−95
−29%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−105
+35.1%
70−75
−35.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+33.3%
90−95
−33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+31%
40−45
−31%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+32.7%
49
−32.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+35.6%
55−60
−35.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+29%
31
−29%
Far Cry 5 100−105
+26.6%
79
−26.6%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+35.8%
80−85
−35.8%
Hitman 3 65−70
+32.7%
49
−32.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+31%
80−85
−31%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+31.9%
70−75
−31.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+29%
90−95
−29%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+33.9%
55−60
−33.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+31.6%
38
−31.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+36.4%
65−70
−36.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+28.2%
35−40
−28.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+25%
30−35
−25%
Hitman 3 40−45
+29%
30−35
−29%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+32.7%
45−50
−32.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+30.4%
45−50
−30.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+20%
24−27
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+30.4%
21−24
−30.4%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+29.6%
50−55
−29.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+32.7%
45−50
−32.7%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+26.3%
18−20
−26.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+32.4%
30−35
−32.4%

This is how RX 6700S and RTX 3050 6 GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700S is 44% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6700S is 49% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.64 27.88
Recency 4 January 2022 2 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 10 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 70 Watt

The Radeon RX 6700S is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6700S is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6700S
Radeon RX 6700S
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 203 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 416 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.