Arc Graphics 130V vs Radeon RX 6700S

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6700S and Arc Graphics 130V, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6700S
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
38.96
+230%

RX 6700S outperforms Arc Graphics 130V by a whopping 230% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking118410
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency33.59no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Xe² (2025)
GPU code nameNavi 23Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2022 (3 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17927
Core clock speed1700 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2000 MHz1850 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Wattno data
Texture fill rate224.0no data
Floating-point processing power7.168 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs112no data
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6700S 38.96
+230%
Arc Graphics 130V 11.80

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6700S 14975
+230%
Arc Graphics 130V 4535

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6700S 32662
+243%
Arc Graphics 130V 9523

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6700S 24135
+192%
Arc Graphics 130V 8255

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 6700S 8316
+157%
Arc Graphics 130V 3242

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD118
+269%
32
−269%
1440p66
+267%
18−20
−267%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+97.6%
41
−97.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+246%
24−27
−246%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+167%
35−40
−167%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+161%
31
−161%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+257%
14−16
−257%
Forza Horizon 4 227
+220%
71
−220%
Forza Horizon 5 100
+223%
30−35
−223%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+194%
30−35
−194%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+157%
30−33
−157%
Valorant 218
+364%
45−50
−364%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+167%
35−40
−167%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+189%
28
−189%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+270%
10−11
−270%
Dota 2 117
+185%
41
−185%
Far Cry 5 45
+60.7%
28
−60.7%
Fortnite 170−180
+151%
65−70
−151%
Forza Horizon 4 183
+216%
58
−216%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+223%
30−35
−223%
Grand Theft Auto V 118
+181%
40−45
−181%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+194%
30−35
−194%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+125%
85−90
−125%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+157%
30−33
−157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+283%
35−40
−283%
Valorant 99
+111%
45−50
−111%
World of Tanks 270−280
+71.2%
160−170
−71.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+167%
35−40
−167%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+224%
25
−224%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+233%
9−10
−233%
Dota 2 103
+243%
30−33
−243%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+111%
45−50
−111%
Forza Horizon 4 157
+227%
48
−227%
Forza Horizon 5 88
+184%
30−35
−184%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+125%
85−90
−125%
Valorant 190
+304%
45−50
−304%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 70−75
+350%
16−18
−350%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+324%
16−18
−324%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+250%
50−55
−250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+290%
10−11
−290%
World of Tanks 240−250
+194%
80−85
−194%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+213%
21−24
−213%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+25.8%
30−35
−25.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+300%
4−5
−300%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+367%
27−30
−367%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+300%
27−30
−300%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+261%
18−20
−261%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+250%
24−27
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+325%
16−18
−325%
Valorant 121
+317%
27−30
−317%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+567%
6−7
−567%
Dota 2 75−80
+245%
21−24
−245%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+245%
21−24
−245%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+371%
7−8
−371%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+260%
35−40
−260%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+213%
8−9
−213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+245%
21−24
−245%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+309%
10−12
−309%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+567%
6−7
−567%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Dota 2 75−80
+262%
21−24
−262%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+287%
14−16
−287%
Fortnite 55−60
+323%
12−14
−323%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+300%
16−18
−300%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%
Valorant 60−65
+433%
12−14
−433%

This is how RX 6700S and Arc Graphics 130V compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700S is 269% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6700S is 267% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6700S is 567% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6700S surpassed Arc Graphics 130V in all 55 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.96 11.80
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm

RX 6700S has a 230.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 130V, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6700S is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 130V in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6700S
Radeon RX 6700S
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 213 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.