Arc Graphics 130V vs Radeon RX 6650M

Place in the ranking	118	411
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	22.45	no data
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Xe² (2025)
GPU code name	Navi 23	Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	4 January 2022 (3 years ago)	no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	7
Core clock speed	2068 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2416 MHz	1850 MHz
Number of transistors	11,060 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	270.6	no data
Floating-point processing power	8.659 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	no data
TMUs	112	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	28	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	256.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12_2
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.1	no data
Vulkan	1.3	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6650M 39.14
+230%

Arc Graphics 130V 11.87

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6650M 15040
+230%

Arc Graphics 130V 4562

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6650M 32846
+245%

Arc Graphics 130V 9523

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6650M 25739
+212%

Arc Graphics 130V 8255

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 6650M 8700
+168%

Arc Graphics 130V 3242

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

116
+263%

−263%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +100%	41 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	127 +263%	35−40 −263%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 +167%	35−40 −167%
Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +165%	31 −165%
Cyberpunk 2077	53 +231%	16−18 −231%
Forza Horizon 4	222 +213%	71 −213%
Forza Horizon 5	100−105 +223%	30−35 −223%
Metro Exodus	90−95 +194%	30−35 −194%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80 +157%	30−33 −157%
Valorant	150−160 +232%	45−50 −232%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 +167%	35−40 −167%
Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +193%	28 −193%
Cyberpunk 2077	39 +290%	10−11 −290%
Dota 2	39 −5.1%	41 +5.1%
Far Cry 5	46 +64.3%	28 −64.3%
Fortnite	170−180 +151%	65−70 −151%
Forza Horizon 4	190 +228%	58 −228%
Forza Horizon 5	100−105 +223%	30−35 −223%
Grand Theft Auto V	120−130 +190%	40−45 −190%
Metro Exodus	33 +3.1%	30−35 −3.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +125%	85−90 −125%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80 +157%	30−33 −157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	130−140 +286%	35−40 −286%
Valorant	150−160 +232%	45−50 −232%
World of Tanks	270−280 +71.2%	160−170 −71.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 +167%	35−40 −167%
Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +228%	25 −228%
Cyberpunk 2077	32 +256%	9−10 −256%
Dota 2	100 +233%	30−33 −233%
Far Cry 5	95−100 +111%	45−50 −111%
Forza Horizon 4	167 +248%	48 −248%
Forza Horizon 5	100−105 +223%	30−35 −223%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +125%	85−90 −125%
Valorant	150−160 +232%	45−50 −232%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	70−75 +350%	16−18 −350%
Grand Theft Auto V	70−75 +329%	16−18 −329%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +250%	50−55 −250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +290%	10−11 −290%
World of Tanks	240−250 +195%	80−85 −195%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +213%	21−24 −213%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +210%	10−11 −210%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +290%	10−11 −290%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +367%	27−30 −367%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +304%	27−30 −304%
Forza Horizon 5	65−70 +261%	18−20 −261%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +254%	24−27 −254%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +325%	16−18 −325%
Valorant	120−130 +324%	27−30 −324%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +60%	14−16 −60%
Dota 2	75−80 +250%	21−24 −250%
Grand Theft Auto V	75−80 +250%	21−24 −250%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +371%	7−8 −371%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +274%	30−35 −274%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +213%	8−9 −213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +250%	21−24 −250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +318%	10−12 −318%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +60%	14−16 −60%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%
Dota 2	75−80 +267%	21−24 −267%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +287%	14−16 −287%
Fortnite	55−60 +323%	12−14 −323%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +306%	16−18 −306%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +311%	9−10 −311%
Valorant	65−70 +442%	12−14 −442%

This is how RX 6650M and Arc Graphics 130V compete in popular games:

RX 6650M is 263% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6650M is 442% faster.
in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 130V is 5% faster.

All in all, in popular games: