Radeon Graphics 128SP vs 680M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking336not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.09no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRembrandt+Raphael
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768128
Core clock speed2000 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 million3,400 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate105.617.60
Floating-point processing power3.379 TFLOPS0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs488
Ray Tracing Cores122

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 680M has an age advantage of 3 months.

Graphics 128SP, on the other hand, has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 680M and Radeon Graphics 128SP. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M
AMD Radeon Graphics 128SP
Radeon Graphics 128SP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 927 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 128SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.