Arc A770 vs Radeon RX 6650M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6650M with Arc A770, including specs and performance data.

RX 6650M
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
38.93
+15.3%

RX 6650M outperforms Arc A770 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking116155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data54.81
Power efficiency22.5510.43
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 23DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17924096
Core clock speed2068 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speed2416 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate270.6614.4
Floating-point processing power8.659 TFLOPS19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs112256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Cores2832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6650M 38.93
+15.3%
Arc A770 33.76

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6650M 15018
+15.3%
Arc A770 13026

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6650M 32846
Arc A770 41303
+25.7%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6650M 25739
Arc A770 32666
+26.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD118
+0%
118
+0%
1440p75−80
+11.9%
67
−11.9%
4K45−50
+7.1%
42
−7.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.79
1440pno data4.91
4Kno data7.83

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 127
+202%
40−45
−202%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+27.7%
65
−27.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
−37.3%
92
+37.3%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+47.1%
85−90
−47.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+49.1%
50−55
−49.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 106
+152%
40−45
−152%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+42.4%
55−60
−42.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+43.3%
65−70
−43.3%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+28.2%
140−150
−28.2%
Hitman 3 80−85
+59.6%
50−55
−59.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+37.3%
110−120
−37.3%
Metro Exodus 120−130
−15.2%
144
+15.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+35.8%
65−70
−35.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+61.4%
85−90
−61.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+21.9%
100−110
−21.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+168%
31
−168%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
−17.9%
79
+17.9%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+47.1%
85−90
−47.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+49.1%
50−55
−49.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+88.1%
40−45
−88.1%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+42.4%
55−60
−42.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+43.3%
65−70
−43.3%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+28.2%
140−150
−28.2%
Hitman 3 80−85
+59.6%
50−55
−59.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+37.3%
110−120
−37.3%
Metro Exodus 120−130
−15.2%
144
+15.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+35.8%
65−70
−35.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 190
−35.8%
258
+35.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+42.9%
55−60
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+21.9%
100−110
−21.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+84.4%
45
−84.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
−7.5%
72
+7.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+49.1%
50−55
−49.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
+52.4%
40−45
−52.4%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+42.4%
55−60
−42.4%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+730%
23
−730%
Hitman 3 80−85
+59.6%
50−55
−59.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+33.9%
121
−33.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 167
−29.3%
216
+29.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
+25%
72
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 62
−19.4%
74
+19.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+35.8%
65−70
−35.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+53.1%
45−50
−53.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+51.3%
35−40
−51.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+5%
40
−5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−39.5%
60
+39.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+58.6%
27−30
−58.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+82.4%
16−18
−82.4%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+48%
140−150
−48%
Hitman 3 50−55
+61.3%
30−35
−61.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−17.6%
100
+17.6%
Metro Exodus 70−75
−24.7%
91
+24.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
−68.1%
158
+68.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−7.1%
60
+7.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+31.7%
140−150
−31.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+55.8%
40−45
−55.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+56%
24−27
−56%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+65%
20−22
−65%
Hitman 3 30−35
+60%
20−22
−60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+37.1%
130−140
−37.1%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−66%
83
+66%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−55.3%
73
+55.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−15.4%
30
+15.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−58.3%
38
+58.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+66.7%
14−16
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+575%
8
−575%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−67.9%
89
+67.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−85%
37
+85%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+59.1%
21−24
−59.1%

This is how RX 6650M and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p
  • RX 6650M is 12% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6650M is 7% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6650M is 730% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A770 is 85% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6650M is ahead in 53 tests (74%)
  • Arc A770 is ahead in 19 tests (26%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.93 33.76
Recency 4 January 2022 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 225 Watt

RX 6650M has a 15.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 87.5% lower power consumption.

Arc A770, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650M is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6650M is a notebook card while Arc A770 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6650M
Intel Arc A770
Arc A770

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 95 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 5215 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.