Radeon RX 6650 XT vs RX 6650M XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6650M XT with Radeon RX 6650 XT, including specs and performance data.

RX 6650M XT
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
44.25

RX 6650 XT outperforms RX 6650M XT by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8278
Place by popularitynot in top-10098
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data62.41
Power efficiency25.5217.54
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23Navi 23
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Core clock speed2068 MHz2055 MHz
Boost clock speed2416 MHz2635 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt176 Watt
Texture fill rate309.2337.3
Floating-point processing power9.896 TFLOPS10.79 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs128128
Ray Tracing Cores3232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2190 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s280.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6650M XT 44.25
RX 6650 XT 44.60
+0.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6650M XT 17070
RX 6650 XT 17206
+0.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
−7.7%
140
+7.7%
1440p65−70
−1.5%
66
+1.5%
4K35−40
−5.7%
37
+5.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.85
1440pno data6.05
4Kno data10.78

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−6300%
128
+6300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3033%
90−95
+3033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4350%
85−90
+4350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5300%
108
+5300%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2300%
95−100
+2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2163%
180−190
+2163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−4100%
160−170
+4100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−386%
130−140
+386%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3033%
90−95
+3033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4350%
85−90
+4350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4300%
88
+4300%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2300%
95−100
+2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2163%
180−190
+2163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−5450%
222
+5450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−922%
90−95
+922%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−386%
130−140
+386%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3033%
90−95
+3033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4350%
85−90
+4350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3800%
78
+3800%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2300%
95−100
+2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2063%
173
+2063%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−4725%
193
+4725%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1089%
107
+1089%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−132%
65
+132%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 44
Hitman 3 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−6350%
129
+6350%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3750%
75−80
+3750%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3100%
30−35
+3100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 27−30

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 114
+0%
114
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 124
+0%
124
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+0%
56
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
+0%
64
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 23
+0%
23
+0%

This is how RX 6650M XT and RX 6650 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650 XT is 8% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6650 XT is 2% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6650 XT is 6% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6650 XT is 6350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6650 XT is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.25 44.60
Recency 4 January 2022 10 May 2022
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 176 Watt

RX 6650M XT has 46.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6650 XT, on the other hand, has a 0.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6650M XT and Radeon RX 6650 XT.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6650M XT is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6650 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT
Radeon RX 6650M XT
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
Radeon RX 6650 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 59 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3299 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.