Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon RX 6650M XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6650M XT with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 6650M XT
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
40.82
+64.5%

6650M XT outperforms Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking113256
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.1954.58
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date4 January 2022 (4 years ago)26 February 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Core clock speed2068 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed2416 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate309.2129.6
Floating-point processing power9.896 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs12864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Cores3216
L0 Cache512 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KB2 MB
L2 Cache2 MB12 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+73.8%
130−140
−73.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+76.4%
55−60
−76.4%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 110−120
+73.8%
65−70
−73.8%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+71.3%
80−85
−71.3%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+73.8%
130−140
−73.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+76.4%
55−60
−76.4%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+74.7%
75−80
−74.7%
Fortnite 170−180
+77%
100−105
−77%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+67.4%
95−100
−67.4%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+73.3%
75−80
−73.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+67.4%
95−100
−67.4%
Valorant 230−240
+68.6%
140−150
−68.6%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+71.3%
80−85
−71.3%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+73.8%
130−140
−73.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+74.4%
160−170
−74.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+76.4%
55−60
−76.4%
Dota 2 140−150
+71.8%
85−90
−71.8%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+74.7%
75−80
−74.7%
Fortnite 170−180
+77%
100−105
−77%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+67.4%
95−100
−67.4%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+73.3%
75−80
−73.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+67.5%
80−85
−67.5%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+65%
60−65
−65%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+67.4%
95−100
−67.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+66.7%
90−95
−66.7%
Valorant 230−240
+68.6%
140−150
−68.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+71.3%
80−85
−71.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+76.4%
55−60
−76.4%
Dota 2 140−150
+71.8%
85−90
−71.8%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+74.7%
75−80
−74.7%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+67.4%
95−100
−67.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+67.4%
95−100
−67.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+66.7%
90−95
−66.7%
Valorant 230−240
+68.6%
140−150
−68.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
+77%
100−105
−77%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+76.7%
60−65
−76.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+70.6%
170−180
−70.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+72%
50−55
−72%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+74.3%
35−40
−74.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+75%
100−105
−75%
Valorant 260−270
+66.9%
160−170
−66.9%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+73.3%
60−65
−73.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+81.5%
27−30
−81.5%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+68.3%
60−65
−68.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+70%
70−75
−70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+77.8%
45−50
−77.8%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+69.2%
65−70
−69.2%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 90−95
+67.3%
55−60
−67.3%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+67.5%
40−45
−67.5%
Valorant 250−260
+67.3%
150−160
−67.3%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+65%
40−45
−65%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Dota 2 110−120
+76.9%
65−70
−76.9%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+77.8%
45−50
−77.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+65.7%
35−40
−65.7%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.82 24.81
Recency 4 January 2022 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 35 Watt

RX 6650M XT has a 65% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 243% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6650M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6650M XT is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 79 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 55 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6650M XT or RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.