Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon RX 6500

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6500 with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 6500
19.85
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
27.31
+37.6%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RX 6500 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking278202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data53.44
Architectureno dataAda Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameno dataAD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release dateno data26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speedno data1485 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2025 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data129.6
Floating-point processing powerno data8.294 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−36.4%
60−65
+36.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−30.8%
85−90
+30.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−30.4%
60−65
+30.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−32.1%
70−75
+32.1%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−30.1%
160−170
+30.1%
Hitman 3 35−40
−28.2%
50−55
+28.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−35.4%
130−140
+35.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−32.1%
70−75
+32.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−36.4%
90−95
+36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
−31.9%
120−130
+31.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−36.4%
60−65
+36.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−30.8%
85−90
+30.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−30.4%
60−65
+30.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−32.1%
70−75
+32.1%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−30.1%
160−170
+30.1%
Hitman 3 35−40
−28.2%
50−55
+28.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−35.4%
130−140
+35.4%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−30.4%
90−95
+30.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−32.1%
70−75
+32.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−36.4%
90−95
+36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−33.3%
60−65
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
−31.9%
120−130
+31.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−36.4%
60−65
+36.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−30.8%
85−90
+30.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−30.4%
60−65
+30.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−32.1%
70−75
+32.1%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−30.1%
160−170
+30.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−33.3%
60−65
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
−31.9%
120−130
+31.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Hitman 3 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−35.1%
50−55
+35.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−31.6%
50−55
+31.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−36.4%
150−160
+36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−36.8%
160−170
+36.8%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Hitman 3 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−35.9%
140−150
+35.9%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Battlefield 5 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.85 27.31

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 37.6% higher aggregate performance score.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6500 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 39 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 18 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.