Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon RX 6600S

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6600S with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 6600S
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
31.13
+25.5%

6600S outperforms Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking199256
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.9654.58
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date4 January 2022 (4 years ago)26 February 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922048
Core clock speed1700 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed2000 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate224.0129.6
Floating-point processing power7.168 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs11264
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Cores2816
L0 Cache448 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KB2 MB
L2 Cache2 MB12 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6600S 31.13
+25.5%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 24.81

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6600S 20458
+40%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14610

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+27.1%
140−150
−27.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 80−85
+33.3%
60−65
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 110−120
+28.9%
90−95
−28.9%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+27.1%
140−150
−27.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+27.5%
80−85
−27.5%
Fortnite 140−150
+30%
110−120
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+29.5%
95−100
−29.5%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+33.3%
75−80
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+27%
100−105
−27%
Valorant 190−200
+31.3%
150−160
−31.3%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 110−120
+28.9%
90−95
−28.9%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+27.1%
140−150
−27.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+25.9%
220−230
−25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%
Dota 2 130−140
+36%
100−105
−36%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+27.5%
80−85
−27.5%
Fortnite 140−150
+30%
110−120
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+29.5%
95−100
−29.5%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+33.3%
75−80
−33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+29.4%
85−90
−29.4%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+32.7%
55−60
−32.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+27%
100−105
−27%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+28.8%
80−85
−28.8%
Valorant 190−200
+31.3%
150−160
−31.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+28.9%
90−95
−28.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%
Dota 2 130−140
+36%
100−105
−36%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+27.5%
80−85
−27.5%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+29.5%
95−100
−29.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+27%
100−105
−27%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+28.8%
80−85
−28.8%
Valorant 190−200
+31.3%
150−160
−31.3%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150
+30%
110−120
−30%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+34.5%
55−60
−34.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+30%
170−180
−30%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+26%
50−55
−26%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+34.6%
130−140
−34.6%
Valorant 230−240
+29.4%
180−190
−29.4%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+29.2%
65−70
−29.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+36.4%
55−60
−36.4%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+30.8%
65−70
−30.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 80−85
+33.3%
60−65
−33.3%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+28%
50−55
−28%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Valorant 190−200
+28%
150−160
−28%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Dota 2 95−100
+29.3%
75−80
−29.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+26.7%
45−50
−26.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.13 24.81
Recency 4 January 2022 26 February 2024
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 35 Watt

RX 6600S has a 25% higher aggregate performance score.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 129% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6600S is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6600S is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 27 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 55 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6600S or RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.