GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Radeon RX 6650M XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6650M XT with GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, including specs and performance data.

RX 6650M XT
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
38.18

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms RX 6650M XT by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking889
Place by popularitynot in top-10091
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data49.13
Power efficiency25.3519.88
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23AD103
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2022 (3 years ago)8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20488448
Core clock speed2068 MHz2340 MHz
Boost clock speed2416 MHz2610 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate309.2689.0
Floating-point processing power9.896 TFLOPS44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs128264
Tensor Coresno data264
Ray Tracing Cores3266

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data310 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s672.3 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6650M XT 38.18
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 71.14
+86.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6650M XT 17070
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31811
+86.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
−102%
222
+102%
1440p75−80
−94.7%
146
+94.7%
4K45−50
−97.8%
89
+97.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.60
1440pno data5.47
4Kno data8.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 120−130
−83.2%
220−230
+83.2%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
−43.5%
300−350
+43.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−103%
197
+103%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 120−130
−83.2%
220−230
+83.2%
Battlefield 5 130−140
−40.9%
190−200
+40.9%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
−43.5%
300−350
+43.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−102%
196
+102%
Far Cry 5 120−130
−59.8%
203
+59.8%
Fortnite 170−180
−71.6%
300−350
+71.6%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−101%
300−350
+101%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
−70.1%
210−220
+70.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−11.3%
170−180
+11.3%
Valorant 230−240
−101%
450−500
+101%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 120−130
−83.2%
220−230
+83.2%
Battlefield 5 130−140
−40.9%
190−200
+40.9%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
−43.5%
300−350
+43.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−77.3%
172
+77.3%
Dota 2 140−150
−84.9%
270−280
+84.9%
Far Cry 5 120−130
−55.1%
197
+55.1%
Fortnite 170−180
−71.6%
300−350
+71.6%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−101%
300−350
+101%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
−70.1%
210−220
+70.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
−30.8%
174
+30.8%
Metro Exodus 95−100
−98%
196
+98%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−11.3%
170−180
+11.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
−191%
430
+191%
Valorant 230−240
−101%
450−500
+101%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
−40.9%
190−200
+40.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−62.9%
158
+62.9%
Dota 2 140−150
−84.9%
270−280
+84.9%
Far Cry 5 120−130
−48%
188
+48%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−101%
300−350
+101%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−11.3%
170−180
+11.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
−41.9%
210
+41.9%
Valorant 230−240
−101%
450−500
+101%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 170−180
−71.6%
300−350
+71.6%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
−128%
240−250
+128%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
−82.3%
500−550
+82.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
−84.5%
155
+84.5%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−115%
131
+115%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 260−270
−83%
450−500
+83%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−88.5%
190−200
+88.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−112%
104
+112%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−88.9%
187
+88.9%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−137%
280−290
+137%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
−101%
159
+101%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
−37.3%
150−160
+37.3%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−136%
75−80
+136%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+36.1%
36
−36.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 90−95
−100%
182
+100%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−121%
84
+121%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−186%
180−190
+186%
Valorant 240−250
−33.3%
300−350
+33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−106%
130−140
+106%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−129%
110−120
+129%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−127%
50
+127%
Dota 2 110−120
−82.6%
210−220
+82.6%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−116%
119
+116%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−211%
240−250
+211%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−65.5%
95−100
+65.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
−43.6%
75−80
+43.6%

This is how RX 6650M XT and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 102% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 95% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 98% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6650M XT is 36% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 211% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6650M XT is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is ahead in 57 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.18 71.14
Recency 4 January 2022 8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 285 Watt

RX 6650M XT has 137.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, on the other hand, has a 86.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6650M XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6650M XT is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT
Radeon RX 6650M XT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 69 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3480 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6650M XT or GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.