GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Radeon RX 6300M

Place in the ranking	330	6
Place by popularity	not in top-100	82
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	48.22
Power efficiency	32.73	19.96
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 24	AD103
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	4 January 2022 (3 years ago)	8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	8448
Core clock speed	2000 MHz	2340 MHz
Boost clock speed	2400 MHz	2610 MHz
Number of transistors	5,400 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	285 Watt
Texture fill rate	115.2	689.0
Floating-point processing power	3.686 TFLOPS	44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	96
TMUs	48	264
Tensor Cores	no data	264
Ray Tracing Cores	12	66

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	310 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	32 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	672.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6300M 16.64

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 82.62
+397%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6300M 6398

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31761
+396%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45−50 −402%	226 +402%
1440p	30−35 −423%	157 +423%
4K	18−20 −433%	96 +433%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.54
1440p	no data	5.09
4K	no data	8.32

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −552%	189 +552%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −385%	160−170 +385%
Elden Ring	50−55 −531%	300−350 +531%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −117%	110−120 +117%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −552%	189 +552%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −385%	160−170 +385%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −587%	467 +587%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −258%	160−170 +258%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −288%	150−160 +288%
Valorant	65−70 −636%	450−500 +636%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −117%	110−120 +117%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −490%	171 +490%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −385%	160−170 +385%
Dota 2	60−65 −190%	174 +190%
Elden Ring	50−55 −531%	300−350 +531%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −154%	150 +154%
Fortnite	90−95 −238%	300−350 +238%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −550%	442 +550%
Grand Theft Auto V	55−60 −195%	174 +195%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −75.6%	79 +75.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −83.8%	210−220 +83.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −288%	150−160 +288%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −241%	170−180 +241%
Valorant	65−70 −636%	450−500 +636%
World of Tanks	200−210 −34.1%	270−280 +34.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −117%	110−120 +117%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −417%	150 +417%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −385%	160−170 +385%
Dota 2	60−65 −383%	290−300 +383%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −166%	150−160 +166%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −499%	407 +499%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −83.8%	210−220 +83.8%
Valorant	65−70 −636%	450−500 +636%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	24−27 −520%	155 +520%
Elden Ring	24−27 −823%	240−250 +823%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −520%	155 +520%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 −13.6%	170−180 +13.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −520%	90−95 +520%
World of Tanks	110−120 −349%	500−550 +349%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −156%	85−90 +156%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −579%	95 +579%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −362%	60−65 +362%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −281%	160−170 +281%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −646%	306 +646%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −284%	140−150 +284%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −623%	159 +623%
Valorant	40−45 −871%	400−450 +871%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −200%	36 +200%
Dota 2	27−30 −528%	182 +528%
Elden Ring	12−14 −1017%	130−140 +1017%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 −550%	182 +550%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −600%	84 +600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −327%	200−210 +327%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −482%	60−65 +482%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −550%	182 +550%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −469%	90−95 +469%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −825%	110−120 +825%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Dota 2	27−30 −383%	140−150 +383%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −400%	100−110 +400%
Fortnite	18−20 −405%	95−100 +405%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −575%	162 +575%
Valorant	18−20 −1163%	240−250 +1163%

This is how RX 6300M and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 402% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 423% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 433% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 1163% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 4070 Ti SUPER surpassed RX 6300M in all 55 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	16.64	82.62
Recency	4 January 2022	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	285 Watt

RX 6300M has 714.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, on the other hand, has a 396.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6300M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6300M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.