RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon RX 6600M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6600M with RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 6600M
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
35.74

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RX 6600M by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13662
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.7129.57
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23no data
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date31 May 2021 (3 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17925120
Core clock speed2068 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2416 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,060 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate270.6no data
Floating-point processing power8.659 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs112no data
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6600M 35.74
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 49.19
+37.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6600M 13789
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 18975
+37.6%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6600M 31868
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 41630
+30.6%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6600M 23525
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 29248
+24.3%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 6600M 7840
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 12806
+63.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD98
−32.7%
130−140
+32.7%
1440p54
−29.6%
70−75
+29.6%
4K31
−29%
40−45
+29%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 110
−36.4%
150−160
+36.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 108
−29.6%
140−150
+29.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95
−36.8%
130−140
+36.8%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−30.4%
150−160
+30.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
−31.9%
95−100
+31.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 90
−33.3%
120−130
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−28.2%
100−105
+28.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
−34.8%
120−130
+34.8%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−37.4%
250−260
+37.4%
Hitman 3 75−80
−33.3%
100−105
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
−32.5%
200−210
+32.5%
Metro Exodus 110−120
−29.3%
150−160
+29.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
−29.4%
110−120
+29.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
−33.9%
170−180
+33.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−30.1%
160−170
+30.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 199
−35.7%
270−280
+35.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
−26.6%
100−105
+26.6%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−30.4%
150−160
+30.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
−31.9%
95−100
+31.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 72
−31.9%
95−100
+31.9%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−28.2%
100−105
+28.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
−34.8%
120−130
+34.8%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−37.4%
250−260
+37.4%
Hitman 3 75−80
−33.3%
100−105
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
−32.5%
200−210
+32.5%
Metro Exodus 110−120
−29.3%
150−160
+29.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
−29.4%
110−120
+29.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 173
−32.9%
230−240
+32.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−35.1%
100−105
+35.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−30.1%
160−170
+30.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 79
−26.6%
100−105
+26.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 69
−30.4%
90−95
+30.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
−31.9%
95−100
+31.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
−31.1%
80−85
+31.1%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−28.2%
100−105
+28.2%
Forza Horizon 4 168
−36.9%
230−240
+36.9%
Hitman 3 75−80
−33.3%
100−105
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 134
−34.3%
180−190
+34.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 153
−37.3%
210−220
+37.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
−29.4%
110−120
+29.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 59
−35.6%
80−85
+35.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
−29.4%
110−120
+29.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−32.4%
90−95
+32.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−29.6%
70−75
+29.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 51
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 52
−34.6%
70−75
+34.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
−25%
45−50
+25%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
−33.7%
270−280
+33.7%
Hitman 3 45−50
−33.3%
60−65
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 98
−32.7%
130−140
+32.7%
Metro Exodus 85
−29.4%
110−120
+29.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100
−30%
130−140
+30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
−37.1%
85−90
+37.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
−32.6%
240−250
+32.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−31.1%
80−85
+31.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−28.6%
45−50
+28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
Hitman 3 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
−35.3%
230−240
+35.3%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−36.4%
60−65
+36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
−36.4%
60−65
+36.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 29
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Forza Horizon 4 74
−35.1%
100−105
+35.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 52
−34.6%
70−75
+34.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−29%
40−45
+29%

This is how RX 6600M and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is 33% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is 30% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is 29% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.74 49.19
Recency 31 May 2021 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 115 Watt

RX 6600M has 15% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 37.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6600M is a notebook graphics card while RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6600M
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 987 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.