Radeon RX 6600M vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and Radeon RX 6600M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
53.75
+72.5%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RX 6600M by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking38145
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.9624.74
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-512Navi 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 October 2022 (2 years ago)31 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961792
Core clock speed930 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speed1680 MHz2416 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data270.6
Floating-point processing powerno data8.659 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed20000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 53.75
+72.5%
RX 6600M 31.16

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 24017
+72.5%
RX 6600M 13925

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 51771
+62.5%
RX 6600M 31868

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 30422
+29.3%
RX 6600M 23525

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 14861
+89.6%
RX 6600M 7840

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 186
+16.9%
RX 6600M 159

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 213
+18.4%
RX 6600M 180

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 300
+83%
RX 6600M 164

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 252
+21.8%
RX 6600M 207

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 199
+94.8%
RX 6600M 102

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 135
+40%
RX 6600M 96

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 163
+35.7%
RX 6600M 120

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 31
+3.4%
RX 6600M 30

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD170−180
+70%
100
−70%
1440p90−95
+63.6%
55
−63.6%
4K50−55
+66.7%
30
−66.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 164
+0%
164
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 107
+0%
107
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 114
+0%
114
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
+0%
83
+0%
Far Cry 5 116
+0%
116
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 202
+0%
202
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 121
+0%
121
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 67
+0%
67
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+0%
69
+0%
Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Far Cry 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 199
+0%
199
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 114
+0%
114
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 116
+0%
116
+0%
Metro Exodus 80
+0%
80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142
+0%
142
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+0%
61
+0%
Dota 2 104
+0%
104
+0%
Far Cry 5 101
+0%
101
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 168
+0%
168
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+0%
85
+0%
Valorant 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 61
+0%
61
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+0%
39
+0%
Far Cry 5 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 128
+0%
128
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+0%
62
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 58
+0%
58
+0%
Metro Exodus 28
+0%
28
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+0%
44
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+0%
19
+0%
Dota 2 80
+0%
80
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 74
+0%
74
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and RX 6600M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 70% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 64% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 67% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 53.75 31.16
Recency 12 October 2022 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 100 Watt

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 72.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

RX 6600M, on the other hand, has 125% lower power consumption.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6600M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6600M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 23 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1040 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile or Radeon RX 6600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.