RTX A2000 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6600 XT with RTX A2000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 6600 XT
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
42.69
+67%

RX 6600 XT outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking78194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation48.49no data
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 23GA107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 July 2021 (2 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$379 no data
Current price$283 (0.7x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482560
Core clock speed1968 MHz893 MHz
Boost clock speed2589 MHz1687 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 (TGP) Watt95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate331.4108.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 6600 XT and RTX A2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length190 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDAno data8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6600 XT 42.69
+67%
RTX A2000 Mobile 25.56

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6600 XT 39051
+116%
RTX A2000 Mobile 18058

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 116% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6600 XT 88163
+38.3%
RTX A2000 Mobile 63738

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 38% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6600 XT 28342
+115%
RTX A2000 Mobile 13157

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 115% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6600 XT 156297
+159%
RTX A2000 Mobile 60336

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 159% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD128
+64.1%
78
−64.1%
1440p75
+82.9%
41
−82.9%
4K41
+2.5%
40
−2.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+62.2%
74
−62.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+63.3%
45−50
−63.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+63.6%
55
−63.6%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+66.7%
80−85
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+63.5%
50−55
−63.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+61.3%
62
−61.3%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+61%
55−60
−61%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+64.2%
65−70
−64.2%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+63.6%
110−120
−63.6%
Hitman 3 85−90
+63.5%
50−55
−63.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+58.4%
100−110
−58.4%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+56.6%
80−85
−56.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+61.8%
65−70
−61.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 220−230
+63%
135
−63%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−105
+61.3%
62
−61.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+63.3%
45−50
−63.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+66.7%
39
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+66.7%
80−85
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+63.5%
50−55
−63.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+60%
50
−60%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+61%
55−60
−61%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+64.2%
65−70
−64.2%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+63.6%
110−120
−63.6%
Hitman 3 50−55
+56.3%
32
−56.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+58.4%
100−110
−58.4%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+66.7%
36
−66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+61.8%
65−70
−61.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 180−190
+66.7%
108
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+66.7%
96
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+66.7%
70−75
−66.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+63.3%
45−50
−63.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+56.3%
32
−56.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+63.5%
50−55
−63.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+58.5%
41
−58.5%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+61%
55−60
−61%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+63.6%
110−120
−63.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+58.4%
100−110
−58.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+59.6%
94
−59.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+60%
50
−60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+55.2%
29
−55.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+61.8%
65−70
−61.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+63.3%
45−50
−63.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+63.6%
55−60
−63.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+66.7%
27−30
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+66.7%
27
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+60%
25
−60%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+60.4%
53
−60.4%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+66.7%
50−55
−66.7%
Hitman 3 50−55
+61.3%
30−35
−61.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+60.4%
50−55
−60.4%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+63.3%
49
−63.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−105
+58.7%
63
−58.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+56.3%
30−35
−56.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+50%
20
−50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+62.8%
40−45
−62.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+60%
24−27
−60%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%
Hitman 3 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+66.7%
30−33
−66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+58.8%
17
−58.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+66.7%
33
−66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+60%
14−16
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+66.7%
30−33
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+60%
24−27
−60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+59.1%
21−24
−59.1%

This is how RX 6600 XT and RTX A2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is 64% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600 XT is 83% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600 XT is 3% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.69 25.56
Recency 30 July 2021 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 95 Watt

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop card while RTX A2000 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3865 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 88 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.