Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs Radeon RX 6600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking154not rated
Place by popularity28not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation52.09no data
Power efficiency21.02no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)MUSA
GPU code nameNavi 23Chunxiao
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date13 October 2021 (4 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17924096
Core clock speed1626 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed2491 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,060 million22,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)132 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate279.0486.4
Floating-point processing power8.928 TFLOPS15.56 TFLOPS
ROPs64256
TMUs112256
Ray Tracing Cores28no data
L0 Cache448 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Length190 mm269 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.4

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 132 Watt 250 Watt

RX 6600 has a 71% more advanced lithography process, and 89% lower power consumption.

Moore Threads MTT S3000, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6600 and Moore Threads MTT S3000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6600 is a desktop graphics card while Moore Threads MTT S3000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 13443 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Moore Threads MTT S3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6600 or Moore Threads MTT S3000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.