Arc Graphics 130T vs Radeon RX 6500
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 6500 and Arc Graphics 130T, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RX 6500 outperforms Graphics 130T by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 335 | 394 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | Xe+ (2025) |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | no data | 6 January 2025 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 7 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | no data | + |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 35−40
+20.7%
| 29
−20.7%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+20%
|
65−70
−20%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65
+24.5%
|
45−50
−24.5%
|
| Fortnite | 95−100
+17.9%
|
80−85
−17.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+20.6%
|
60−65
−20.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
+25.5%
|
45−50
−25.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 70−75
+26.8%
|
55−60
−26.8%
|
| Valorant | 140−150
+14.5%
|
120−130
−14.5%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+20%
|
65−70
−20%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 220−230
+14%
|
200−210
−14%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+25.9%
|
85−90
−25.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65
+24.5%
|
45−50
−24.5%
|
| Fortnite | 95−100
+17.9%
|
80−85
−17.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+20.6%
|
60−65
−20.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
+25.5%
|
45−50
−25.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 65−70
+306%
|
17
−306%
|
| Metro Exodus | 40−45
+29%
|
30−35
−29%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 70−75
+26.8%
|
55−60
−26.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 50−55
+30%
|
40−45
−30%
|
| Valorant | 140−150
+14.5%
|
120−130
−14.5%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+20%
|
65−70
−20%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+25.9%
|
85−90
−25.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65
+24.5%
|
45−50
−24.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+20.6%
|
60−65
−20.6%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 70−75
+26.8%
|
55−60
−26.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 50−55
+30%
|
40−45
−30%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 95−100
+17.9%
|
80−85
−17.9%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 130−140
+21.6%
|
110−120
−21.6%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+33.3%
|
24−27
−33.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 24−27
+26.3%
|
18−20
−26.3%
|
| Valorant | 170−180
+15%
|
150−160
−15%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+26.2%
|
40−45
−26.2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+27.3%
|
30−35
−27.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+24.3%
|
35−40
−24.3%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 40−45
+26.5%
|
30−35
−26.5%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+21.4%
|
27−30
−21.4%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+36.4%
|
10−12
−36.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+28.6%
|
21−24
−28.6%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
+27.7%
|
80−85
−27.7%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+27.3%
|
21−24
−27.3%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+30%
|
50−55
−30%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+31.3%
|
16−18
−31.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+23.1%
|
24−27
−23.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
+26.7%
|
14−16
−26.7%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 18−20
+26.7%
|
14−16
−26.7%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Counter-Strike 2 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
This is how RX 6500 and Arc Graphics 130T compete in popular games:
- RX 6500 is 21% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6500 is 306% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 6500 performs better in 41 tests (76%)
- there's a draw in 13 tests (24%)
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
