RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GA103

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated62
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data29.63
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA103Sno data
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date23 February 2022 (2 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48645120
Core clock speed1410 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1665 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate253.1no data
Floating-point processing power16.2 TFLOPSno data
ROPs80no data
TMUs152no data
Tensor Cores152no data
Ray Tracing Cores38no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 February 2022 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 115 Watt

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile has an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 73.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GA103 and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GA103 is a desktop card while RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GA103
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GA103
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 36 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GA103 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 6 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.