GeForce GTX 590 vs Radeon RX 580

Place in the ranking	246	498
Place by popularity	1	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	18.04	0.78
Power efficiency	8.58	1.64
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	Polaris 20	GF110
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)	24 March 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$229	$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 580 has 2213% better value for money than GTX 590.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	1024
Core clock speed	1257 MHz	607 MHz
Boost clock speed	1340 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	5,700 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	185 Watt	365 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	97 °C
Texture fill rate	193.0	38.91
Floating-point processing power	6.175 TFLOPS	1.244 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	48
TMUs	144	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	16x PCI-E 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	241 mm	279 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	2x 8-pin
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)
Memory bus width	256 Bit	768-bit (384-bit per GPU)
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	1707 MHz
Memory bandwidth	256.0 GB/s	327.7 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.2
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 580 23.02
+165%

GTX 590 8.69

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 580 8847
+165%

GTX 590 3341

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 580 19274
+110%

GTX 590 9167

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 580 44344
+72.4%

GTX 590 25720

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 580 13927
+108%

GTX 590 6680

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	120−130 +155%	47 −155%
Full HD	96 −12.5%	108 +12.5%
1200p	290−300 +159%	112 −159%
1440p	44 +175%	16−18 −175%
4K	38 +171%	14−16 −171%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.39 +171%	6.47 −171%
1440p	5.20 +739%	43.69 −739%
4K	6.03 +729%	49.93 −729%

RX 580 has 171% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 580 has 739% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 580 has 729% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +180%	14−16 −180%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +171%	16−18 −171%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	80 +186%	27−30 −186%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +180%	14−16 −180%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +171%	16−18 −171%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +183%	35−40 −183%
Forza Horizon 5	60−65 +190%	21−24 −190%
Metro Exodus	83 +261%	21−24 −261%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +113%	24−27 −113%
Valorant	90−95 +191%	30−35 −191%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	117 +318%	27−30 −318%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +180%	14−16 −180%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +171%	16−18 −171%
Dota 2	51 +64.5%	30−35 −64.5%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +97.3%	35−40 −97.3%
Fortnite	110−120 +131%	50−55 −131%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +183%	35−40 −183%
Forza Horizon 5	60−65 +190%	21−24 −190%
Grand Theft Auto V	77 +148%	30−35 −148%
Metro Exodus	57 +148%	21−24 −148%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	202 +197%	65−70 −197%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +113%	24−27 −113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 +185%	24−27 −185%
Valorant	90−95 +191%	30−35 −191%
World of Tanks	240−250 +93%	120−130 −93%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	68 +143%	27−30 −143%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +180%	14−16 −180%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +171%	16−18 −171%
Dota 2	80−85 +158%	30−35 −158%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +97.3%	35−40 −97.3%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +183%	35−40 −183%
Forza Horizon 5	60−65 +190%	21−24 −190%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70 +2.9%	65−70 −2.9%
Valorant	90−95 +191%	30−35 −191%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	35−40 +245%	10−12 −245%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 +245%	10−12 −245%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +314%	40−45 −314%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
World of Tanks	150−160 +144%	60−65 −144%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +194%	16−18 −194%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +261%	18−20 −261%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +221%	18−20 −221%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +185%	12−14 −185%
Metro Exodus	53 +253%	14−16 −253%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +175%	12−14 −175%
Valorant	60−65 +177%	21−24 −177%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Dota 2	57 +200%	18−20 −200%
Grand Theft Auto V	57 +200%	18−20 −200%
Metro Exodus	18 +350%	4−5 −350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	73 +192%	24−27 −192%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	57 +200%	18−20 −200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	28 +300%	7−8 −300%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Dota 2	40−45 +111%	18−20 −111%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +200%	10−11 −200%
Fortnite	31 +244%	9−10 −244%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +218%	10−12 −218%
Forza Horizon 5	18−20 +217%	6−7 −217%
Valorant	27−30 +263%	8−9 −263%

This is how RX 580 and GTX 590 compete in popular games:

RX 580 is 155% faster in 900p
GTX 590 is 13% faster in 1080p
RX 580 is 159% faster in 1200p
RX 580 is 175% faster in 1440p
RX 580 is 171% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 580 is 567% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 580 is ahead in 63 tests (98%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	23.02	8.69
Recency	18 April 2017	24 March 2011
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)
Chip lithography	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	185 Watt	365 Watt

RX 580 has a 164.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 97.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 580 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 590 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.