Radeon RX 6700 vs RX 580 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 580 Mobile with Radeon RX 6700, including specs and performance data.
RX 6700 outperforms 580 Mobile by a whopping 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 337 | 90 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 8.11 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 13.90 | 19.84 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | Polaris 20 | Navi 22 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 18 April 2017 (8 years ago) | 9 June 2021 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $301.69 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1941 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1077 MHz | 2450 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 17,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 155.1 | 352.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.963 TFLOPS | 11.29 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 36 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 576 KB |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 80 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 10 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 160 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 77
−147%
| 190−200
+147%
|
| 4K | 30
−133%
| 70−75
+133%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 3.92 | no data |
| 4K | 10.06 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
−148%
|
260−270
+148%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
−144%
|
95−100
+144%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
−147%
|
190−200
+147%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
−148%
|
260−270
+148%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
−144%
|
95−100
+144%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 70−75
−143%
|
180−190
+143%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65
−133%
|
140−150
+133%
|
| Fortnite | 183
−146%
|
450−500
+146%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
−140%
|
180−190
+140%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
−141%
|
140−150
+141%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 69
−146%
|
170−180
+146%
|
| Valorant | 140−150
−148%
|
350−400
+148%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
−147%
|
190−200
+147%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
−148%
|
260−270
+148%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 220−230
−142%
|
550−600
+142%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
−144%
|
95−100
+144%
|
| Dota 2 | 76
−137%
|
180−190
+137%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 70−75
−143%
|
180−190
+143%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65
−133%
|
140−150
+133%
|
| Fortnite | 81
−147%
|
200−210
+147%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
−140%
|
180−190
+140%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
−141%
|
140−150
+141%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 62
−142%
|
150−160
+142%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
−144%
|
95−100
+144%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 57
−146%
|
140−150
+146%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 68
−135%
|
160−170
+135%
|
| Valorant | 140−150
−148%
|
350−400
+148%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
−147%
|
190−200
+147%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
−144%
|
95−100
+144%
|
| Dota 2 | 69
−146%
|
170−180
+146%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 70−75
−143%
|
180−190
+143%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65
−133%
|
140−150
+133%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
−140%
|
180−190
+140%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 41
−144%
|
100−105
+144%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 37
−143%
|
90−95
+143%
|
| Valorant | 140−150
−148%
|
350−400
+148%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 60
−133%
|
140−150
+133%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
−143%
|
90−95
+143%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 130−140
−124%
|
300−310
+124%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
−134%
|
75−80
+134%
|
| Metro Exodus | 24−27
−129%
|
55−60
+129%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
−137%
|
400−450
+137%
|
| Valorant | 170−180
−129%
|
400−450
+129%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
−131%
|
120−130
+131%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
−135%
|
40−45
+135%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 35−40
−144%
|
95−100
+144%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
−144%
|
100−105
+144%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
−139%
|
110−120
+139%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
−132%
|
65−70
+132%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 40−45
−138%
|
100−105
+138%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−119%
|
35−40
+119%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
−135%
|
80−85
+135%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
−133%
|
35−40
+133%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24
−129%
|
55−60
+129%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
−148%
|
260−270
+148%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−132%
|
65−70
+132%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−119%
|
35−40
+119%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
−129%
|
16−18
+129%
|
| Dota 2 | 60−65
−134%
|
150−160
+134%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 18−20
−122%
|
40−45
+122%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
−138%
|
50−55
+138%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
−134%
|
75−80
+134%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14
−114%
|
30−33
+114%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 18−20
−137%
|
45−50
+137%
|
This is how RX 580 Mobile and RX 6700 compete in popular games:
- RX 6700 is 147% faster in 1080p
- RX 6700 is 133% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 18.02 | 45.03 |
| Recency | 18 April 2017 | 9 June 2021 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 10 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 175 Watt |
RX 580 Mobile has 75% lower power consumption.
RX 6700, on the other hand, has a 149.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 6700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 580 Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon RX 580 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6700 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
