Radeon RX 6750 GRE vs RX 580 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 580 Mobile with Radeon RX 6750 GRE, including specs and performance data.

RX 580 Mobile
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
19.48

RX 6750 GRE outperforms RX 580 Mobile by a whopping 139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking28970
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.2244.67
Power efficiency13.4012.81
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 20Navi 22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$301.69 $549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6750 GRE has 92% better value for money than RX 580 Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042560
Core clock speed1000 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1077 MHz2581 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate155.1413.0
Floating-point processing power4.963 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3264
TMUs144160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD78
−131%
180−190
+131%
4K31
−126%
70−75
+126%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.87
−26.8%
3.05
+26.8%
4K9.73
−24.1%
7.84
+24.1%
  • RX 6750 GRE has 27% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6750 GRE has 24% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−129%
80−85
+129%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−131%
90−95
+131%
Elden Ring 60−65
−126%
140−150
+126%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−126%
140−150
+126%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−129%
80−85
+129%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−131%
90−95
+131%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−132%
190−200
+132%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−131%
120−130
+131%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−122%
100−105
+122%
Valorant 75−80
−128%
180−190
+128%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−126%
140−150
+126%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−129%
80−85
+129%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−131%
90−95
+131%
Dota 2 66
−127%
150−160
+127%
Elden Ring 60−65
−126%
140−150
+126%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−127%
150−160
+127%
Fortnite 68
−135%
160−170
+135%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−132%
190−200
+132%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
−126%
140−150
+126%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−131%
120−130
+131%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 198
−127%
450−500
+127%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−122%
100−105
+122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
−135%
160−170
+135%
Valorant 75−80
−128%
180−190
+128%
World of Tanks 220−230
−119%
500−550
+119%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−126%
140−150
+126%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−129%
80−85
+129%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−131%
90−95
+131%
Dota 2 69
−132%
160−170
+132%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−127%
150−160
+127%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−132%
190−200
+132%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 58
−124%
130−140
+124%
Valorant 75−80
−128%
180−190
+128%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%
Elden Ring 30−35
−134%
75−80
+134%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−126%
70−75
+126%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−135%
400−450
+135%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
World of Tanks 130−140
−126%
300−310
+126%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−138%
95−100
+138%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−131%
120−130
+131%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−120%
110−120
+120%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−127%
100−105
+127%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−131%
60−65
+131%
Valorant 50−55
−120%
110−120
+120%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Dota 2 30−35
−127%
75−80
+127%
Elden Ring 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−127%
75−80
+127%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−124%
130−140
+124%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−127%
75−80
+127%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Dota 2 30−35
−127%
75−80
+127%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−120%
55−60
+120%
Fortnite 21−24
−117%
50−55
+117%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−124%
65−70
+124%
Valorant 21−24
−117%
50−55
+117%

This is how RX 580 Mobile and RX 6750 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 GRE is 131% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 GRE is 126% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.48 46.54
Recency 18 April 2017 17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 250 Watt

RX 580 Mobile has 150% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE, on the other hand, has a 138.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 580 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 580 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 580 Mobile
Radeon RX 580 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE
Radeon RX 6750 GRE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 230 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.