Quadro 5000 vs Radeon RX 580 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 580 Mobile with Quadro 5000, including specs and performance data.

RX 580 Mobile
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
19.49
+287%

RX 580 Mobile outperforms 5000 by a whopping 287% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking291635
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.100.16
Power efficiency13.422.28
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code namePolaris 20GF100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)23 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$301.69 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 580 Mobile has 14338% better value for money than Quadro 5000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304352
Core clock speed1000 MHz513 MHz
Boost clock speed1077 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt152 Watt
Texture fill rate155.122.57
Floating-point processing power4.963 TFLOPS0.7223 TFLOPS
ROPs3240
TMUs14444

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2.5 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz750 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s120.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD78
+333%
18−21
−333%
4K31
+288%
8−9
−288%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.87
+3489%
138.83
−3489%
4K9.73
+3110%
312.38
−3110%
  • RX 580 Mobile has 3489% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 580 Mobile has 3110% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+290%
10−11
−290%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+288%
16−18
−288%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+290%
10−11
−290%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+290%
21−24
−290%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+333%
12−14
−333%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+342%
12−14
−342%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+350%
10−11
−350%
Valorant 75−80
+339%
18−20
−339%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+288%
16−18
−288%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+290%
10−11
−290%
Dota 2 66
+313%
16−18
−313%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+313%
16−18
−313%
Fortnite 68
+325%
16−18
−325%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+290%
21−24
−290%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+333%
12−14
−333%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+288%
16−18
−288%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+342%
12−14
−342%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 198
+296%
50−55
−296%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+350%
10−11
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+325%
16−18
−325%
Valorant 75−80
+339%
18−20
−339%
World of Tanks 220−230
+315%
55−60
−315%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+288%
16−18
−288%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+290%
10−11
−290%
Dota 2 69
+331%
16−18
−331%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+313%
16−18
−313%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+290%
21−24
−290%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+333%
12−14
−333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 58
+314%
14−16
−314%
Valorant 75−80
+339%
18−20
−339%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+325%
40−45
−325%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
World of Tanks 130−140
+343%
30−33
−343%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+300%
10−11
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+333%
12−14
−333%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+317%
12−14
−317%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+340%
10−11
−340%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Valorant 50−55
+317%
12−14
−317%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Dota 2 30−35
+313%
8−9
−313%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+313%
8−9
−313%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+314%
14−16
−314%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+313%
8−9
−313%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Dota 2 30−35
+313%
8−9
−313%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%
Fortnite 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Valorant 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%

This is how RX 580 Mobile and Quadro 5000 compete in popular games:

  • RX 580 Mobile is 333% faster in 1080p
  • RX 580 Mobile is 288% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.49 5.04
Recency 18 April 2017 23 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2.5 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 152 Watt

RX 580 Mobile has a 286.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 220% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 52% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 580 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 5000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 580 Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro 5000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 580 Mobile
Radeon RX 580 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Quadro 5000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 33 votes

Rate Quadro 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.