Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs RX 5700M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5700M with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

RX 5700M
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 180 Watt
3.82

AI PRO R9700 outperforms RX 5700M by a whopping 1764% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking73416
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.6218.10
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameNavi 10Navi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2020 (5 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23044096
Core clock speed1465 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1720 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate247.7747.5
Floating-point processing power7.926 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs144256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 5700M 3.82
AI PRO R9700 71.19
+1764%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5700M 1599
AI PRO R9700 29830
+1766%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−1713%
290−300
+1713%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
God of War 9−10
−1678%
160−170
+1678%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−1700%
270−280
+1700%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−1713%
290−300
+1713%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−1733%
220−230
+1733%
Fortnite 21−24
−1718%
400−450
+1718%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1742%
350−400
+1742%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−1700%
180−190
+1700%
God of War 9−10
−1678%
160−170
+1678%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−1713%
290−300
+1713%
Valorant 50−55
−1692%
950−1000
+1692%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−1700%
270−280
+1700%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−1713%
290−300
+1713%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−1757%
1300−1350
+1757%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
Dota 2 35−40
−1757%
650−700
+1757%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−1733%
220−230
+1733%
Fortnite 21−24
−1718%
400−450
+1718%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1742%
350−400
+1742%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−1700%
180−190
+1700%
God of War 9−10
−1678%
160−170
+1678%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−1733%
220−230
+1733%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−1757%
130−140
+1757%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−1713%
290−300
+1713%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1733%
220−230
+1733%
Valorant 50−55
−1692%
950−1000
+1692%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−1700%
270−280
+1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
Dota 2 35−40
−1757%
650−700
+1757%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−1733%
220−230
+1733%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1742%
350−400
+1742%
God of War 9−10
−1678%
160−170
+1678%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−1713%
290−300
+1713%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1733%
220−230
+1733%
Valorant 50−55
−1692%
950−1000
+1692%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−1718%
400−450
+1718%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−1624%
500−550
+1624%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−1619%
550−600
+1619%
Valorant 40−45
−1650%
700−750
+1650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1757%
130−140
+1757%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−1678%
160−170
+1678%
God of War 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1650%
70−75
+1650%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−1757%
130−140
+1757%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1713%
290−300
+1713%
Valorant 18−20
−1742%
350−400
+1742%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 12−14
−1733%
220−230
+1733%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
God of War 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−1650%
70−75
+1650%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−1650%
70−75
+1650%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.82 71.19
Recency 1 March 2020 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 300 Watt

RX 5700M has 66.7% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 1763.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5700M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5700M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 46 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5700M or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.