Radeon Pro 5500M vs RX 5700 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5700 XT with Radeon Pro 5500M, including specs and performance data.

RX 5700 XT
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
42.56
+143%

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro 5500M by a whopping 143% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking94319
Place by popularity41not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.08no data
Power efficiency13.0514.25
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 10Navi 14
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)13 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601536
Core clock speed1605 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1905 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate304.8139.2
Floating-point processing power9.754 TFLOPS4.454 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16096

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length272 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan+1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 5700 XT 42.56
+143%
Pro 5500M 17.55

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5700 XT 16456
+142%
Pro 5500M 6786

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 5700 XT 35823
+143%
Pro 5500M 14725

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 5700 XT 26189
+152%
Pro 5500M 10399

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 5700 XT 146093
+122%
Pro 5500M 65776

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 5700 XT 499658
+37.2%
Pro 5500M 364184

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD129
+119%
59
−119%
1440p78
+30%
60
−30%
4K49
+44.1%
34
−44.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.09no data
1440p5.12no data
4K8.14no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 175
+307%
40−45
−307%
Counter-Strike 2 93
+210%
30−33
−210%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+123%
35−40
−123%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 133
+209%
40−45
−209%
Battlefield 5 119
+56.6%
76
−56.6%
Counter-Strike 2 76
+153%
30−33
−153%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+123%
35−40
−123%
Far Cry 5 138
+146%
55−60
−146%
Fortnite 223
+145%
90−95
−145%
Forza Horizon 4 155
+128%
65−70
−128%
Forza Horizon 5 130
+217%
41
−217%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 177
+190%
60−65
−190%
Valorant 313
+141%
130−140
−141%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 78
+81.4%
40−45
−81.4%
Battlefield 5 110
+77.4%
62
−77.4%
Counter-Strike 2 64
+113%
30−33
−113%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+33.7%
208
−33.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 75
+114%
35−40
−114%
Dota 2 92
−20.7%
111
+20.7%
Far Cry 5 130
+132%
55−60
−132%
Fortnite 179
+96.7%
90−95
−96.7%
Forza Horizon 4 154
+126%
65−70
−126%
Forza Horizon 5 110
+139%
45−50
−139%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+110%
69
−110%
Metro Exodus 97
+162%
37
−162%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 166
+172%
60−65
−172%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 154
+126%
68
−126%
Valorant 294
+126%
130−140
−126%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 105
+78%
59
−78%
Counter-Strike 2 57
+90%
30−33
−90%
Cyberpunk 2077 67
+91.4%
35−40
−91.4%
Dota 2 103
−3.9%
107
+3.9%
Far Cry 5 111
+102%
55
−102%
Forza Horizon 4 148
+118%
65−70
−118%
Forza Horizon 5 104
+126%
45−50
−126%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 139
+128%
60−65
−128%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 93
+138%
39
−138%
Valorant 159
+468%
28
−468%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 143
+57.1%
90−95
−57.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+131%
118
−131%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+126%
35
−126%
Metro Exodus 57
+159%
22
−159%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+63.6%
107
−63.6%
Valorant 286
+74.4%
160−170
−74.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 89
+89.4%
47
−89.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+167%
14−16
−167%
Far Cry 5 97
+143%
40
−143%
Forza Horizon 4 119
+190%
40−45
−190%
Forza Horizon 5 72
+140%
30−33
−140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+188%
24−27
−188%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 93
+151%
35−40
−151%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+146%
12−14
−146%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+216%
25
−216%
Metro Exodus 35
+169%
12−14
−169%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+135%
21−24
−135%
Valorant 242
+163%
90−95
−163%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60
+329%
14
−329%
Counter-Strike 2 8
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+183%
6−7
−183%
Dota 2 93
+72.2%
54
−72.2%
Far Cry 5 53
+165%
20
−165%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+172%
27−30
−172%
Forza Horizon 5 37
+164%
14−16
−164%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 53
+231%
16−18
−231%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45
+181%
16−18
−181%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 71
+0%
71
+0%

This is how RX 5700 XT and Pro 5500M compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT is 119% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5700 XT is 30% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5700 XT is 44% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5700 XT is 468% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5500M is 21% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT is ahead in 63 tests (93%)
  • Pro 5500M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.56 17.55
Recency 7 July 2019 13 November 2019
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 85 Watt

RX 5700 XT has a 142.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Pro 5500M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 164.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5500M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop card while Radeon Pro 5500M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 8385 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 272 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5700 XT or Radeon Pro 5500M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.