Radeon PRO W7800 vs RX 5700 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5700 XT with Radeon PRO W7800, including specs and performance data.

RX 5700 XT
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
42.91

PRO W7800 outperforms RX 5700 XT by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8916
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.9829.90
Power efficiency13.0919.49
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 10Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5700 XT has 57% better value for money than PRO W7800.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25604480
Core clock speed1605 MHz1855 MHz
Boost clock speed1905 MHz2499 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate304.8699.7
Floating-point processing power9.754 TFLOPS44.78 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs160280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length272 mm280 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan+1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5700 XT 42.91
PRO W7800 73.83
+72.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5700 XT 16529
PRO W7800 28439
+72.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD125
−68%
210−220
+68%
1440p76
−71.1%
130−140
+71.1%
4K45
−66.7%
75−80
+66.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.1911.90
1440p5.2519.22
4K8.8733.32

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 78
−66.7%
130−140
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 76
−71.1%
130−140
+71.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 110
−63.6%
180−190
+63.6%
Battlefield 5 199
−50.8%
300−310
+50.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 118
−69.5%
200−210
+69.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
−66.7%
130−140
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 125
−68%
210−220
+68%
Far Cry New Dawn 118
−69.5%
200−210
+69.5%
Forza Horizon 4 298
−67.8%
500−550
+67.8%
Hitman 3 84
−66.7%
140−150
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 313
−59.7%
500−550
+59.7%
Metro Exodus 144
−66.7%
240−250
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 115
−65.2%
190−200
+65.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160−170
−67.7%
270−280
+67.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 259
−54.4%
400−450
+54.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 154
−68.8%
260−270
+68.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 91
−64.8%
150−160
+64.8%
Battlefield 5 165
−69.7%
280−290
+69.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 107
−68.2%
180−190
+68.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 75
−60%
120−130
+60%
Far Cry 5 101
−68.3%
170−180
+68.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 108
−66.7%
180−190
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 283
−59%
450−500
+59%
Hitman 3 86
−62.8%
140−150
+62.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 294
−70.1%
500−550
+70.1%
Metro Exodus 144
−66.7%
240−250
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 97
−64.9%
160−170
+64.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 193
−55.4%
300−310
+55.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
−68.5%
150−160
+68.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 248
−61.3%
400−450
+61.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
−61.3%
100−105
+61.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78
−66.7%
130−140
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80
−62.5%
130−140
+62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 67
−64.2%
110−120
+64.2%
Far Cry 5 73
−64.4%
120−130
+64.4%
Forza Horizon 4 148
−68.9%
250−260
+68.9%
Hitman 3 83
−68.7%
140−150
+68.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 135
−70.4%
230−240
+70.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 171
−69.6%
290−300
+69.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 93
−72%
160−170
+72%
Watch Dogs: Legion 67
−64.2%
110−120
+64.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 108
−66.7%
180−190
+66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 126
−66.7%
210−220
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 84
−66.7%
140−150
+66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 53
−69.8%
90−95
+69.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 59
−69.5%
100−105
+69.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 58
−63.8%
95−100
+63.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
−62.5%
65−70
+62.5%
Far Cry 5 59
−69.5%
100−105
+69.5%
Forza Horizon 4 273
−64.8%
450−500
+64.8%
Hitman 3 59
−69.5%
100−105
+69.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 104
−63.5%
170−180
+63.5%
Metro Exodus 104
−63.5%
170−180
+63.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 119
−68.1%
200−210
+68.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−69.2%
110−120
+69.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 241
−66%
400−450
+66%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 79
−64.6%
130−140
+64.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 56
−69.6%
95−100
+69.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 44
−70.5%
75−80
+70.5%
Hitman 3 45
−66.7%
75−80
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 121
−65.3%
200−210
+65.3%
Metro Exodus 65
−69.2%
110−120
+69.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
−66.7%
90−95
+66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 33
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
Far Cry 5 30
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 79
−64.6%
130−140
+64.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 71
−69%
120−130
+69%
Watch Dogs: Legion 13
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40
−62.5%
65−70
+62.5%

This is how RX 5700 XT and PRO W7800 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7800 is 68% faster in 1080p
  • PRO W7800 is 71% faster in 1440p
  • PRO W7800 is 67% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.91 73.83
Recency 7 July 2019 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 260 Watt

RX 5700 XT has 15.6% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800, on the other hand, has a 72.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5700 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop card while Radeon PRO W7800 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT
AMD Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 7938 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 35 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.