GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 5700 XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5700 XT with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

RX 5700 XT
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
42.87
+156%

RX 5700 XT outperforms GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by a whopping 156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking90328
Place by popularity54not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.50no data
Power efficiency13.1523.14
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 10TU117
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601024
Core clock speed1605 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed1905 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate304.876.80
Floating-point processing power9.754 TFLOPS2.458 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length272 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan+1.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5700 XT 42.87
+156%
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 16.77

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5700 XT 16486
+156%
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 6449

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 5700 XT 35823
+210%
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 11538

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 5700 XT 83961
+170%
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 31116

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 5700 XT 26189
+206%
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 8564

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 5700 XT 146093
+207%
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 47657

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 5700 XT 499658
+18.4%
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 421834

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD127
+127%
56
−127%
1440p76
+111%
36
−111%
4K48
+100%
24
−100%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.14no data
1440p5.25no data
4K8.31no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 93
+210%
30−33
−210%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+136%
30−35
−136%
Elden Ring 133
+156%
50−55
−156%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 93
+72.2%
50−55
−72.2%
Counter-Strike 2 76
+153%
30−33
−153%
Cyberpunk 2077 82
+382%
17
−382%
Forza Horizon 4 234
+204%
77
−204%
Metro Exodus 156
+179%
56
−179%
Red Dead Redemption 2 115
+82.5%
63
−82.5%
Valorant 190
+109%
91
−109%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 194
+259%
50−55
−259%
Counter-Strike 2 64
+113%
30−33
−113%
Cyberpunk 2077 72
+454%
13
−454%
Dota 2 127
+54.9%
82
−54.9%
Elden Ring 157
+202%
50−55
−202%
Far Cry 5 57
−17.5%
67
+17.5%
Fortnite 180−190
+97.8%
90−95
−97.8%
Forza Horizon 4 193
+211%
62
−211%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+116%
67
−116%
Metro Exodus 111
+192%
38
−192%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 246
+108%
110−120
−108%
Red Dead Redemption 2 66
+65%
40−45
−65%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+198%
50−55
−198%
Valorant 112
+167%
42
−167%
World of Tanks 270−280
+33.5%
200−210
−33.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 81
+50%
50−55
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 57
+90%
30−33
−90%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+473%
11
−473%
Dota 2 103
−2.9%
106
+2.9%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+71.2%
55−60
−71.2%
Forza Horizon 4 171
+217%
54
−217%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+75.4%
110−120
−75.4%
Valorant 159
+137%
65−70
−137%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 79
+204%
26
−204%
Elden Ring 88
+226%
27−30
−226%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+204%
26
−204%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+12.2%
150−160
−12.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 42
+180%
14−16
−180%
World of Tanks 270−280
+134%
110−120
−134%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80
+135%
30−35
−135%
Counter-Strike 2 36
+157%
14−16
−157%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+200%
12−14
−200%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+229%
40−45
−229%
Forza Horizon 4 119
+240%
35
−240%
Metro Exodus 104
+181%
35−40
−181%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+250%
21−24
−250%
Valorant 119
+183%
40−45
−183%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 28
+133%
12−14
−133%
Dota 2 79
+216%
25
−216%
Elden Ring 39
+225%
12−14
−225%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+216%
25
−216%
Metro Exodus 35
+192%
12−14
−192%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 144
+188%
50−55
−188%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+145%
10−12
−145%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+216%
25
−216%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 52
+225%
16−18
−225%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+275%
12−14
−275%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+240%
5−6
−240%
Dota 2 93
+78.8%
52
−78.8%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+214%
21−24
−214%
Fortnite 60−65
+232%
18−20
−232%
Forza Horizon 4 71
+238%
21
−238%
Valorant 62
+226%
18−20
−226%

This is how RX 5700 XT and GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT is 127% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5700 XT is 111% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5700 XT is 100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5700 XT is 473% faster.
  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 18% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT is ahead in 61 test (97%)
  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is ahead in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.87 16.77
Recency 7 July 2019 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 50 Watt

RX 5700 XT has a 155.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 350% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 8192 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 214 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.