Radeon RX 5700M vs RX 560X Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 560X Mobile and Radeon RX 5700M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RX 560X Mobile outperforms RX 5700M by a whopping 160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 442 | 704 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 11.30 | 1.57 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) |
| GPU code name | Polaris 21 | Navi 10 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 11 April 2018 (6 years ago) | 1 March 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 1275 MHz | 1465 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1202 MHz | 1720 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 10,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 81.60 | 247.7 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.611 TFLOPS | 7.926 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 64 |
| TMUs | 64 | 144 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1450 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 92.8 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 34
+183%
| 12−14
−183%
|
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - Full HD
Epic Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Epic Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset - 4K
Epic Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+286%
|
14−16
−286%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 23
+188%
|
8−9
−188%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 31
+288%
|
8−9
−288%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 52
+247%
|
14−16
−247%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+286%
|
14−16
−286%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 17
+113%
|
8−9
−113%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 39
+255%
|
10−12
−255%
|
| Fortnite | 66
+200%
|
21−24
−200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 52
+189%
|
18−20
−189%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 34
+278%
|
9−10
−278%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 23
+188%
|
8−9
−188%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50
+213%
|
16−18
−213%
|
| Valorant | 95−100
+79.2%
|
50−55
−79.2%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 44
+193%
|
14−16
−193%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+286%
|
14−16
−286%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 122
+74.3%
|
70−75
−74.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 15
+87.5%
|
8−9
−87.5%
|
| Dota 2 | 71
+103%
|
35−40
−103%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 36
+227%
|
10−12
−227%
|
| Fortnite | 44
+100%
|
21−24
−100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 49
+172%
|
18−20
−172%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 31
+244%
|
9−10
−244%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 36
+200%
|
12−14
−200%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 18
+125%
|
8−9
−125%
|
| Metro Exodus | 20
+186%
|
7−8
−186%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 42
+163%
|
16−18
−163%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 36
+200%
|
12−14
−200%
|
| Valorant | 95−100
+79.2%
|
50−55
−79.2%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 39
+160%
|
14−16
−160%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 13
+62.5%
|
8−9
−62.5%
|
| Dota 2 | 66
+88.6%
|
35−40
−88.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 33
+200%
|
10−12
−200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 38
+111%
|
18−20
−111%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12
+50%
|
8−9
−50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30
+87.5%
|
16−18
−87.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 22
+83.3%
|
12−14
−83.3%
|
| Valorant | 95−100
+79.2%
|
50−55
−79.2%
|
| Fortnite | 33
+50%
|
21−24
−50%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+260%
|
5−6
−260%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 75−80
+166%
|
27−30
−166%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+400%
|
3−4
−400%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
+450%
|
2−3
−450%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+96.4%
|
27−30
−96.4%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+173%
|
40−45
−173%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+133%
|
9−10
−133%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+167%
|
9−10
−167%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12
+175%
|
4−5
−175%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+133%
|
6−7
−133%
|
| Fortnite | 21−24
+200%
|
7−8
−200%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
+31.3%
|
16−18
−31.3%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
+200%
|
2−3
−200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+200%
|
4−5
−200%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
+179%
|
18−20
−179%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+160%
|
5−6
−160%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
| Dota 2 | 35−40
+208%
|
12−14
−208%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
+100%
|
5−6
−100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+125%
|
4−5
−125%
|
| Fortnite | 10−11
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
This is how RX 560X Mobile and RX 5700M compete in popular games:
- RX 560X Mobile is 183% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 560X Mobile is 450% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RX 560X Mobile surpassed RX 5700M in all 58 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 10.39 | 4.00 |
| Recency | 11 April 2018 | 1 March 2020 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 180 Watt |
RX 560X Mobile has a 159.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 176.9% lower power consumption.
RX 5700M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 560X Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5700M in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
