Riva 128 vs Radeon RX 5600 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking142not rated
Place by popularity79not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation55.44no data
Power efficiency16.40no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)no data
GPU code nameNavi 10NV3
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 January 2020 (4 years ago)1 April 1997 (27 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speed1130 MHz100 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million4 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate224.60.1
Floating-point processing power7.188 TFLOPSno data
ROPs641
TMUs1441

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 2x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz100 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s1.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x VGA, 1x DB13W3
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)5.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 January 2020 1 April 1997
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 350 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 4 Watt

RX 5600 XT has an age advantage of 22 years, a 153500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4900% more advanced lithography process.

Riva 128, on the other hand, has 3650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5600 XT and Riva 128. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Radeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIA Riva 128
Riva 128

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2800 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 39 votes

Rate Riva 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.