Radeon R7 350 vs RX 560

Place in the ranking	467	603
Place by popularity	91	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.48	no data
Power efficiency	8.65	6.96
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code name	Polaris 21	Cape Verde
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)	6 July 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$99	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	512
Core clock speed	1175 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	1275 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,000 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	55 Watt
Texture fill rate	81.60	25.60
Floating-point processing power	2.611 TFLOPS	0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	64	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	170 mm	168 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	72 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

35
+94.4%

18−21

−94.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

2.83

no data

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.47	5.59
Recency	18 April 2017	6 July 2016
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	55 Watt

RX 560 has a 69.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

R7 350, on the other hand, has 36.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 560 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 350 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.