P102-100 vs Radeon RX 560
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 435 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 60 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.53 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | Polaris 21 | GP102 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 18 April 2017 (7 years ago) | 12 February 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | $599 |
| Current price | $381 (3.8x MSRP) | $1200 (2x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 3200 |
| Core clock speed | 1175 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz | 1683 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 11,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 81.60 | 336.6 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,611 gflops | 10,125 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Length | 170 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 5 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 11008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 440.3 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | no data | 6.1 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
P102-100 outperforms Radeon RX 560 by 244% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 April 2017 | 12 February 2018 |
| Cost | $99 | $599 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 5 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 560 and P102-100. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
