Radeon RX 560 vs TITAN Xp
Aggregate performance score
We've compared TITAN Xp and Radeon RX 560, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
TITAN Xp outperforms RX 560 by a whopping 428% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 88 | 534 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 75 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 11.62 | 1.48 |
| Power efficiency | 14.31 | 9.03 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | GP102 | Polaris 21 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 6 April 2017 (9 years ago) | 18 April 2017 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | $99 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
TITAN Xp has 685% better value for money than RX 560.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3840 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1405 MHz | 1175 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | 1275 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 11,800 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 379.7 | 81.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | 12.15 TFLOPS | 2.611 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 96 | 16 |
| TMUs | 240 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 1024 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 267 mm | 170 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1426 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 547.6 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | + | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 180−190
+414%
| 35
−414%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 6.66
−135%
| 2.83
+135%
|
- RX 560 has 135% lower cost per frame in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 46.45 | 8.80 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 75 Watt |
TITAN Xp has a 428% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.
RX 560, on the other hand, has a 14% more advanced lithography process, and 233% lower power consumption.
The TITAN Xp is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 560 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
