Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs Radeon RX 5500 XT

Place in performance ranking	215	773
Place by popularity	82	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	15.37	0.66
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	no data
GPU code name	Navi 14 XTX	no data
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	12 December 2019 (4 years ago)	6 December 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$169	no data
Current price	$317 (1.9x MSRP)	$1429

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5500 XT has 2229% better value for money than Qualcomm Adreno 685.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1408	no data
Core clock speed	1607 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1845 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	6,400 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	7 Watt
Texture fill rate	162.4	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 5500 XT and Qualcomm Adreno 685 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	no data
Length	180 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	no data
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	no data
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5500 XT 23.72
+782%

Qualcomm Adreno 685 2.69

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 685 by 782% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 5500 XT 9159
+927%

Qualcomm Adreno 685 892

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 685 by 927% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 5500 XT 19499
+912%

Qualcomm Adreno 685 1927

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 685 by 912% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	74 +825%	8−9 −825%
1440p	41 +925%	4−5 −925%
4K	24 +1100%	2−3 −1100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	72 +800%	8−9 −800%
Battlefield 5	75−80	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	61	no data
Far Cry 5	55−60	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65	no data
Forza Horizon 4	78	no data
Hitman 3	64	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	166	no data
Metro Exodus	132 +843%	14−16 −843%
Red Dead Redemption 2	108	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	133	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	74	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	58 +867%	6−7 −867%
Battlefield 5	75−80	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	45	no data
Far Cry 5	55−60	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65	no data
Forza Horizon 4	100−110	no data
Hitman 3	61	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95	no data
Metro Exodus	93 +830%	10−11 −830%
Red Dead Redemption 2	88	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	108	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	202	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	49 +880%	5−6 −880%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	40	no data
Far Cry 5	55−60	no data
Forza Horizon 4	56	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	87	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	95	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	58	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	36	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	67	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	37 +825%	4−5 −825%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	20	no data
Far Cry 5	60	no data
Forza Horizon 4	41	no data
Hitman 3	36	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	65	no data
Metro Exodus	60 +900%	6−7 −900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	66 +843%	7−8 −843%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	26	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20	no data
Hitman 3	26 +1200%	2−3 −1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	22 +1000%	2−3 −1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	31 +933%	3−4 −933%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	19	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	8	0−1
Far Cry 5	12−14	no data
Forza Horizon 4	21 +950%	2−3 −950%
Horizon Zero Dawn	37	no data
Metro Exodus	31	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	14	no data