Quadro T2000 Mobile vs Radeon RX 5500 XT

Place in the ranking	231	261
Place by popularity	96	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	49.06	no data
Power efficiency	12.67	23.98
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Navi 14	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	12 December 2019 (4 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$169	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1408	1024
Core clock speed	1607 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	1845 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	6,400 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	162.4	114.2
Floating-point processing power	5.196 TFLOPS	3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	88	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	180 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5500 XT 23.68
+14.5%

T2000 Mobile 20.69

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5500 XT 9137
+14.4%

T2000 Mobile 7985

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 5500 XT 19499
+44.2%

T2000 Mobile 13524

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	78 +20%	65−70 −20%
1440p	42 +20%	35−40 −20%
4K	24 +33.3%	18−21 −33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

78
+136%

30−35

−136%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +13%	45−50 −13%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	72 +106%	35−40 −106%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +14.7%	65−70 −14.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +14.3%	40−45 −14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	61 +84.8%	30−35 −84.8%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +14.6%	45−50 −14.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +12.7%	55−60 −12.7%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +10.2%	120−130 −10.2%
Hitman 3	64 +56.1%	40−45 −56.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +11.1%	95−100 −11.1%
Metro Exodus	132 +85.9%	70−75 −85.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	108 +96.4%	55−60 −96.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +15.9%	65−70 −15.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	202 +117%	90−95 −117%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	66 +43.5%	45−50 −43.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	58 +65.7%	35−40 −65.7%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +14.7%	65−70 −14.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +14.3%	40−45 −14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	45 +36.4%	30−35 −36.4%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +14.6%	45−50 −14.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +12.7%	55−60 −12.7%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +10.2%	120−130 −10.2%
Hitman 3	62 +51.2%	40−45 −51.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +11.1%	95−100 −11.1%
Metro Exodus	94 +32.4%	70−75 −32.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +12.7%	55−60 −12.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	108 +56.5%	65−70 −56.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +13%	45−50 −13%
Watch Dogs: Legion	202 +117%	90−95 −117%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +13%	45−50 −13%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	49 +40%	35−40 −40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +14.3%	40−45 −14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 +21.2%	30−35 −21.2%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +14.6%	45−50 −14.6%
Forza Horizon 4	56 −127%	120−130 +127%
Hitman 3	55 +34.1%	40−45 −34.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	87 −13.8%	95−100 +13.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	95 +37.7%	65−70 −37.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	58 +26.1%	45−50 −26.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	36 −158%	90−95 +158%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

76
+38.2%

55−60

−38.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +12.5%	40−45 −12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +12.5%	30−35 −12.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +19%	21−24 −19%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	37 +94.7%	18−20 −94.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +17.4%	21−24 −17.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	20 +66.7%	12−14 −66.7%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +12.5%	24−27 −12.5%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +16.4%	110−120 −16.4%
Hitman 3	36 +50%	24−27 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65 +54.8%	40−45 −54.8%
Metro Exodus	60 +53.8%	35−40 −53.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	66 +53.5%	40−45 −53.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +20.8%	24−27 −20.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	184 +52.1%	120−130 −52.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

49
+44.1%

30−35

−44.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +15%	20−22 −15%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +12.5%	16−18 −12.5%
Hitman 3	26 +62.5%	16−18 −62.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +14%	100−110 −14%
Metro Exodus	37 +68.2%	21−24 −68.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	31 +47.6%	21−24 −47.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	19 +72.7%	10−12 −72.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	8 +100%	4−5 −100%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
Forza Horizon 4	21 −33.3%	27−30 +33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	38 +58.3%	24−27 −58.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24
+33.3%

18−20

−33.3%

This is how RX 5500 XT and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

RX 5500 XT is 20% faster in 1080p
RX 5500 XT is 20% faster in 1440p
RX 5500 XT is 33% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 5500 XT is 136% faster.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 158% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 5500 XT is ahead in 68 tests (94%)
T2000 Mobile is ahead in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	23.68	20.69
Recency	12 December 2019	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	60 Watt

RX 5500 XT has a 14.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

T2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has 116.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 5500 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5500 XT is a desktop card while Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.