Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs RX 550 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 550 Mobile with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

RX 550 Mobile
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
6.43

AI PRO R9700 outperforms RX 550 Mobile by a whopping 1007% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking60017
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.47no data
Power efficiency9.8118.10
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameLexaNavi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 July 2017 (8 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6404096
Core clock speed1100 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1287 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate51.48747.5
Floating-point processing power1.647 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs40256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−963%
170−180
+963%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−994%
350−400
+994%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−1000%
110−120
+1000%
God of War 14
−971%
150−160
+971%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−971%
300−310
+971%
Counter-Strike 2 38
−953%
400−450
+953%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−977%
140−150
+977%
Far Cry 5 18
−956%
190−200
+956%
Fortnite 40−45
−900%
400−450
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−934%
300−310
+934%
Forza Horizon 5 13
−977%
140−150
+977%
God of War 5
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−983%
260−270
+983%
Valorant 70−75
−942%
750−800
+942%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−971%
300−310
+971%
Counter-Strike 2 11
−991%
120−130
+991%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
−975%
1150−1200
+975%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−977%
140−150
+977%
Dota 2 45
−900%
450−500
+900%
Far Cry 5 15
−967%
160−170
+967%
Fortnite 40−45
−900%
400−450
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−934%
300−310
+934%
Forza Horizon 5 10
−1000%
110−120
+1000%
God of War 14−16
−971%
150−160
+971%
Grand Theft Auto V 18
−956%
190−200
+956%
Metro Exodus 4
−900%
40−45
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−983%
260−270
+983%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−959%
180−190
+959%
Valorant 70−75
−942%
750−800
+942%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−971%
300−310
+971%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−977%
140−150
+977%
Dota 2 43
−947%
450−500
+947%
Far Cry 5 13
−977%
140−150
+977%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−934%
300−310
+934%
God of War 14−16
−971%
150−160
+971%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−983%
260−270
+983%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
−983%
260−270
+983%
Valorant 70−75
−942%
750−800
+942%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
−900%
400−450
+900%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−983%
130−140
+983%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−1000%
550−600
+1000%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−926%
400−450
+926%
Valorant 70−75
−996%
800−850
+996%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−983%
130−140
+983%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−977%
140−150
+977%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−967%
160−170
+967%
God of War 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−977%
140−150
+977%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−956%
190−200
+956%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Valorant 30−35
−961%
350−400
+961%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Dota 2 21−24
−987%
250−260
+987%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−1000%
110−120
+1000%
God of War 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%

This is how RX 550 Mobile and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 963% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.43 71.19
Recency 2 July 2017 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 300 Watt

RX 550 Mobile has 500% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 1007.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 550 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 550 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 550 Mobile
Radeon RX 550 Mobile
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 39 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 550 Mobile or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.