Radeon RX 550 Mobile vs R9 M380
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R9 M380 and Radeon RX 550 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
R9 M380 outperforms RX 550 Mobile by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 545 | 556 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 4.47 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.63 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | Strato | Lexa |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 May 2015 (9 years ago) | 2 July 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $79.99 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1287 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2,080 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 51.48 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.536 TFLOPS | 1.647 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 48 | 40 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | + |
| HD3D | + | - |
| PowerTune | + | - |
| DualGraphics | + | - |
| TrueAudio | + | - |
| ZeroCore | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.2.131 |
| Mantle | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 14−16
−7.1%
| 15
+7.1%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 5.33 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+25%
|
12
−25%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+40%
|
10
−40%
|
| Elden Ring | 18−20
+35.7%
|
14
−35.7%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+4.5%
|
21−24
−4.5%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+3.6%
|
28
−3.6%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+9.1%
|
21−24
−9.1%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+4.5%
|
21−24
−4.5%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+275%
|
4
−275%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 24−27
−8%
|
27
+8%
|
| Elden Ring | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+10.3%
|
29
−10.3%
|
| Fortnite | 40−45
+4.9%
|
40−45
−4.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+20.8%
|
24
−20.8%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+38.9%
|
18
−38.9%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+1.8%
|
55−60
−1.8%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+9.1%
|
21−24
−9.1%
|
| World of Tanks | 110−120
+2.8%
|
100−110
−2.8%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+4.5%
|
21−24
−4.5%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 24−27
−72%
|
43
+72%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+3.2%
|
30−35
−3.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+81.3%
|
16
−81.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+1.8%
|
55−60
−1.8%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+9.1%
|
21−24
−9.1%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Elden Ring | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| World of Tanks | 50−55
+4%
|
50−55
−4%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+7.1%
|
14−16
−7.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+7.7%
|
12−14
−7.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
| Valorant | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Elden Ring | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20
+5.9%
|
16−18
−5.9%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+5%
|
20−22
−5%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Valorant | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
This is how R9 M380 and RX 550 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RX 550 Mobile is 7% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M380 is 275% faster.
- in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 550 Mobile is 72% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- R9 M380 is ahead in 32 tests (51%)
- RX 550 Mobile is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
- there's a draw in 29 tests (46%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 7.21 | 6.98 |
| Recency | 5 May 2015 | 2 July 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
R9 M380 has a 3.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
RX 550 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R9 M380 and Radeon RX 550 Mobile.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
