RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs Radeon RX 5300M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5300M with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

RX 5300M
2019
3 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
11.87

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms RX 5300M by a whopping 501% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking43821
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.81
Power efficiency9.938.46
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameNavi 14GB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 November 2019 (5 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores140824064
Core clock speed1000 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed1445 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate127.21,968
Floating-point processing power4.069 TFLOPS126 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs88752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount3 GB96 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.0 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 5300M 11.87
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 71.35
+501%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5300M 4723
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 28386
+501%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD62
−465%
350−400
+465%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data24.47

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−456%
350−400
+456%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−483%
140−150
+483%
Dead Island 2 40−45
−495%
250−260
+495%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 92
−498%
550−600
+498%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−456%
350−400
+456%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−483%
140−150
+483%
Dead Island 2 40−45
−495%
250−260
+495%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−479%
220−230
+479%
Fortnite 114
−470%
650−700
+470%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−492%
290−300
+492%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−500%
210−220
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−485%
240−250
+485%
Valorant 100−110
−483%
600−650
+483%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 79
−470%
450−500
+470%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−456%
350−400
+456%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
−472%
950−1000
+472%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−483%
140−150
+483%
Dead Island 2 40−45
−495%
250−260
+495%
Dota 2 98
−461%
550−600
+461%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−479%
220−230
+479%
Fortnite 82
−449%
450−500
+449%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−492%
290−300
+492%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−500%
210−220
+500%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
−447%
350−400
+447%
Metro Exodus 39
−490%
230−240
+490%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−485%
240−250
+485%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
−483%
350−400
+483%
Valorant 100−110
−483%
600−650
+483%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 71
−463%
400−450
+463%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−483%
140−150
+483%
Dead Island 2 40−45
−495%
250−260
+495%
Dota 2 95
−479%
550−600
+479%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−479%
220−230
+479%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−492%
290−300
+492%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−485%
240−250
+485%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
−479%
220−230
+479%
Valorant 100−110
−483%
600−650
+483%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 58
−417%
300−310
+417%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−471%
120−130
+471%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
−475%
500−550
+475%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−488%
100−105
+488%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−477%
75−80
+477%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−497%
400−450
+497%
Valorant 120−130
−500%
750−800
+500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
−500%
180−190
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Dead Island 2 18−20
−479%
110−120
+479%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−500%
150−160
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−471%
160−170
+471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−488%
100−105
+488%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−500%
150−160
+500%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Dead Island 2 12−14
−483%
70−75
+483%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−465%
130−140
+465%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−471%
80−85
+471%
Valorant 60−65
−474%
350−400
+474%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−500%
90−95
+500%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Dead Island 2 12−14
−483%
70−75
+483%
Dota 2 40−45
−495%
250−260
+495%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−483%
70−75
+483%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−500%
120−130
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−491%
65−70
+491%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−491%
65−70
+491%

This is how RX 5300M and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 465% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.87 71.35
Recency 13 November 2019 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 600 Watt

RX 5300M has 605.9% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 501.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5300M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5300M is a notebook card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 97 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 15 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5300M or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.