GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs Radeon RX 5300M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5300M and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 5300M
2019
3 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
10.56

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile outperforms RX 5300M by a whopping 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking415221
Place by popularitynot in top-10069
Power efficiency9.8924.03
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 14GA106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 November 2019 (5 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14082560
Core clock speed1000 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1445 MHz1035 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate127.282.80
Floating-point processing power4.069 TFLOPS5.299 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs8880
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 5300M 10.56
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 22.65
+114%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5300M 4723
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 10126
+114%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 5300M 14351
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 18057
+25.8%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 5300M 10306
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 13360
+29.6%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 5300M 55837
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 72925
+30.6%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 5300M 3567
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 5170
+45%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD62
−21%
75
+21%
1440p18−20
−133%
42
+133%
4K12−14
−117%
26
+117%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
−224%
94
+224%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−125%
140−150
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−158%
62
+158%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
−145%
71
+145%
Battlefield 5 92
−17.4%
108
+17.4%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−125%
140−150
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−146%
59
+146%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−103%
79
+103%
Fortnite 114
−6.1%
120−130
+6.1%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−100%
95−100
+100%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−161%
94
+161%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−134%
95−100
+134%
Valorant 100−110
−63.1%
160−170
+63.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
−44.8%
42
+44.8%
Battlefield 5 79
−24.1%
98
+24.1%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−125%
140−150
+125%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
−56%
250−260
+56%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−87.5%
45
+87.5%
Dota 2 98
−20.4%
118
+20.4%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−89.7%
74
+89.7%
Fortnite 82
−47.6%
120−130
+47.6%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−100%
95−100
+100%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−133%
84
+133%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
−46.9%
94
+46.9%
Metro Exodus 39
−46.2%
57
+46.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−134%
95−100
+134%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
−53.3%
92
+53.3%
Valorant 100−110
−63.1%
160−170
+63.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 71
−25.4%
89
+25.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−66.7%
40
+66.7%
Dota 2 95
−18.9%
113
+18.9%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−74.4%
68
+74.4%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−100%
95−100
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−134%
95−100
+134%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
−31.6%
50
+31.6%
Valorant 100−110
−8.7%
112
+8.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 58
−109%
120−130
+109%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
−98.9%
170−180
+98.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−141%
41
+141%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−162%
34
+162%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−122%
170−180
+122%
Valorant 120−130
−65.6%
200−210
+65.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
−130%
69
+130%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−120%
22
+120%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−100%
50
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−129%
60−65
+129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−133%
40−45
+133%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−136%
55−60
+136%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−317%
24−27
+317%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−91.3%
44
+91.3%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−200%
21
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−107%
29
+107%
Valorant 60−65
−138%
140−150
+138%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−153%
38
+153%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−317%
24−27
+317%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10
+150%
Dota 2 40−45
−28.6%
54
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−75%
21
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−120%
40−45
+120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−136%
24−27
+136%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%

This is how RX 5300M and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 21% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 133% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 117% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 317% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3050 Ti Mobile surpassed RX 5300M in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.56 22.65
Recency 13 November 2019 11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 75 Watt

RX 5300M has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 114.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 13.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5300M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 96 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4396 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5300M or GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.