GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh vs Qualcomm Adreno 685

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking914not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.24no data
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameno dataGA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 December 2018 (6 years ago)6 July 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speedno data1237 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1492 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data95.49
Floating-point processing powerno data6.111 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data96 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data144.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 December 2018 6 July 2022
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 75 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 685 has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 971.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm Adreno 685 and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 685
Adreno 685
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 17 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 685 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 98 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm Adreno 685 or GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.