GeForce GTX 590 vs Radeon RX 480

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 480 and GeForce GTX 590, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 480
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
22.33
+158%

RX 480 outperforms GTX 590 by a whopping 158% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking230466
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.410.48
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code namePolaris 10 EllesmereGF110
GCN generation4th Genno data
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date29 June 2016 (8 years ago)24 March 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $699
Current price$174 (0.8x MSRP)$600 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 480 has 2277% better value for money than GTX 590.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
CUDA coresno data1024
Compute units36no data
Core clock speed1120 MHz607 MHz
Boost clock speed1266 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt365 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rate182.377.7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance5,834 gflops2x 1,244.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportn/a16x PCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mm11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinTwo 8-pin
SLI optionsno data+
Bridgeless CrossFire1no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)
Memory bus width256 Bit768-bit (384-bit per GPU)
Memory clock speed8000 MHz1707 MHz
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s327.7 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortThree Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data+
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI2.0+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
DisplayPort support1.4HDRno data
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAccelerationn/ano data
CrossFire1no data
Enduron/ano data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync+no data
HD3Dn/ano data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune+no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudion/ano data
ZeroCore+no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.2
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan+N/A
Mantlen/ano data
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 480 22.33
+158%
GTX 590 8.65

Radeon RX 480 outperforms GeForce GTX 590 by 158% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 480 8624
+158%
GTX 590 3341

Radeon RX 480 outperforms GeForce GTX 590 by 158% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 480 17919
+95.5%
GTX 590 9167

Radeon RX 480 outperforms GeForce GTX 590 by 95% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 480 39552
+53.8%
GTX 590 25720

Radeon RX 480 outperforms GeForce GTX 590 by 54% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 480 12186
+82.4%
GTX 590 6680

Radeon RX 480 outperforms GeForce GTX 590 by 82% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p120−130
+155%
47
−155%
Full HD82
−29.3%
106
+29.3%
1200p280−290
+150%
112
−150%
1440p57
+171%
21−24
−171%
4K36
+200%
12−14
−200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+157%
14−16
−157%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 58
+222%
18−20
−222%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+217%
12−14
−217%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+181%
24−27
−181%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+150%
18−20
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+157%
14−16
−157%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+160%
20−22
−160%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+146%
24−27
−146%
Forza Horizon 4 100
+138%
40−45
−138%
Hitman 3 45−50
+181%
16−18
−181%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+132%
35−40
−132%
Metro Exodus 93
+272%
24−27
−272%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+150%
24−27
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+178%
27−30
−178%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+103%
30−35
−103%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49
+172%
18−20
−172%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+217%
12−14
−217%
Battlefield 5 48
+84.6%
24−27
−84.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+150%
18−20
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+157%
14−16
−157%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+160%
20−22
−160%
Far Cry New Dawn 31
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+136%
40−45
−136%
Hitman 3 45−50
+181%
16−18
−181%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+132%
35−40
−132%
Metro Exodus 39
+56%
24−27
−56%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+150%
24−27
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+178%
27−30
−178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 78
+333%
18−20
−333%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+103%
30−35
−103%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+217%
12−14
−217%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+150%
18−20
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+157%
14−16
−157%
Far Cry 5 45
+125%
20−22
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 77
+83.3%
40−45
−83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+132%
35−40
−132%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+178%
27−30
−178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+144%
18−20
−144%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+103%
30−35
−103%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+150%
24−27
−150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65
+282%
16−18
−282%
Far Cry New Dawn 50
+257%
14−16
−257%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+164%
10−12
−164%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+175%
16−18
−175%
Hitman 3 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
Metro Exodus 50
+355%
10−12
−355%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+422%
9−10
−422%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+238%
8−9
−238%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+164%
14−16
−164%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 31
+288%
8−9
−288%
Far Cry New Dawn 21
+250%
6−7
−250%
Hitman 3 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
+350%
4−5
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
+350%
6−7
−350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 17
+240%
5−6
−240%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 15
+200%
5−6
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+210%
10−11
−210%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Metro Exodus 26
+189%
9−10
−189%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%

This is how RX 480 and GTX 590 compete in popular games:

  • RX 480 is 155% faster in 900p
  • GTX 590 is 29% faster in 1080p
  • RX 480 is 150% faster in 1200p
  • RX 480 is 171% faster in 1440p
  • RX 480 is 200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 480 is 425% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 480 surpassed GTX 590 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.33 8.65
Recency 29 June 2016 24 March 2011
Cost $229 $699
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 365 Watt

The Radeon RX 480 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 590 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 480
Radeon RX 480
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
GeForce GTX 590

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1661 vote

Rate Radeon RX 480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 47 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.