Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs Radeon RX 470

Place in the ranking	261	417
Place by popularity	47	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	17.90	no data
Power efficiency	12.02	19.74
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	no data
GPU code name	Ellesmere	no data
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	4 August 2016 (8 years ago)	no data
Launch price (MSRP)	$179	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	1536
Core clock speed	926 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1206 MHz	1500 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	154.4	no data
Floating-point processing power	4.94 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	128	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1650 MHz	8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth	211.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	no data
HDMI	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12_1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 470 21.02
+82.6%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 11.51

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 470 17625
+150%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 7061

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 470 11885
+70.2%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 6982

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	72 +94.6%	37 −94.6%
1440p	38 +111%	18−21 −111%
4K	35 +94.4%	18−20 −94.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.49	no data
1440p	4.71	no data
4K	5.11	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35
+83.3%

18−20

−83.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +91.7%	24−27 −91.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +94.4%	18−20 −94.4%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +97.1%	35−40 −97.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +105%	21−24 −105%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +83.3%	18−20 −83.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +104%	24−27 −104%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +86.7%	30−33 −86.7%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +82.9%	70−75 −82.9%
Hitman 3	40−45 +95.2%	21−24 −95.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 +100%	50−55 −100%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +106%	35−40 −106%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +86.7%	30−33 −86.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	102 +85.5%	55−60 −85.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +88%	50−55 −88%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +91.7%	24−27 −91.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +94.4%	18−20 −94.4%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +97.1%	35−40 −97.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +105%	21−24 −105%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +83.3%	18−20 −83.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +104%	24−27 −104%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +86.7%	30−33 −86.7%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +82.9%	70−75 −82.9%
Hitman 3	40−45 +95.2%	21−24 −95.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 +100%	50−55 −100%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +106%	35−40 −106%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +86.7%	30−33 −86.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	88 +95.6%	45−50 −95.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +95.8%	24−27 −95.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +88%	50−55 −88%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +91.7%	24−27 −91.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +94.4%	18−20 −94.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +105%	21−24 −105%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +83.3%	18−20 −83.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +104%	24−27 −104%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +82.9%	70−75 −82.9%
Hitman 3	40−45 +95.2%	21−24 −95.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	74 +85%	40−45 −85%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	67 +91.4%	35−40 −91.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40 +90.5%	21−24 −90.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +88%	50−55 −88%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
+86.7%

30−33

−86.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +90.5%	21−24 −90.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +100%	16−18 −100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +110%	10−11 −110%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +90%	10−11 −90%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +91.7%	12−14 −91.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +96.7%	60−65 −96.7%
Hitman 3	24−27 +108%	12−14 −108%
Horizon Zero Dawn	53 +96.3%	27−30 −96.3%
Metro Exodus	46 +91.7%	24−27 −91.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	51 +88.9%	27−30 −88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +89.2%	65−70 −89.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40
+94.4%

18−20

−94.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +110%	10−11 −110%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
Hitman 3	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 +96.4%	55−60 −96.4%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +91.7%	12−14 −91.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +107%	14−16 −107%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	25 +108%	12−14 −108%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%