Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs Radeon RX 470

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 470 with Qualcomm Adreno 685, including specs and performance data.

RX 470
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
21.01
+727%

RX 470 outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 685 by a whopping 727% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking261827
Place by popularity47not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.89no data
Power efficiency12.0024.86
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)no data
GPU code nameEllesmereno data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 August 2016 (8 years ago)6 December 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed926 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1206 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate154.4no data
Floating-point processing power4.94 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs128no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1650 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth211.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 470 21.01
+727%
Qualcomm Adreno 685 2.54

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 470 8096
+727%
Qualcomm Adreno 685 979

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 470 17625
+815%
Qualcomm Adreno 685 1927

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD72
+800%
8−9
−800%
1440p38
+850%
4−5
−850%
4K35
+775%
4−5
−775%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.49no data
1440p4.71no data
4K5.11no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+411%
9−10
−411%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 0−1
Battlefield 5 65−70
+1625%
4−5
−1625%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+514%
7−8
−514%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+880%
5−6
−880%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+700%
7−8
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+885%
12−14
−885%
Hitman 3 40−45
+486%
7−8
−486%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
+376%
21−24
−376%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+3500%
2−3
−3500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+833%
6−7
−833%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 102
+750%
12−14
−750%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+147%
35−40
−147%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+411%
9−10
−411%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 0−1
Battlefield 5 65−70
+1625%
4−5
−1625%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+514%
7−8
−514%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+880%
5−6
−880%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+700%
7−8
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+885%
12−14
−885%
Hitman 3 40−45
+486%
7−8
−486%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
+376%
21−24
−376%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+3500%
2−3
−3500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+833%
6−7
−833%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 88
+633%
12−14
−633%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+236%
14−16
−236%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+147%
35−40
−147%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+411%
9−10
−411%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+514%
7−8
−514%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+880%
5−6
−880%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+885%
12−14
−885%
Hitman 3 40−45
+486%
7−8
−486%
Horizon Zero Dawn 74
+252%
21−24
−252%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 67
+458%
12−14
−458%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
+186%
14−16
−186%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+147%
35−40
−147%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+833%
6−7
−833%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+743%
14−16
−743%
Hitman 3 24−27
+213%
8−9
−213%
Horizon Zero Dawn 53
+657%
7−8
−657%
Metro Exodus 46
+820%
5−6
−820%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 51
+750%
6−7
−750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+669%
16−18
−669%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+483%
6−7
−483%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Hitman 3 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+800%
12−14
−800%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 25
+733%
3−4
−733%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%

This is how RX 470 and Qualcomm Adreno 685 compete in popular games:

  • RX 470 is 800% faster in 1080p
  • RX 470 is 850% faster in 1440p
  • RX 470 is 775% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 470 is 3500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 470 surpassed Qualcomm Adreno 685 in all 57 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.01 2.54
Recency 4 August 2016 6 December 2018
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 7 Watt

RX 470 has a 727.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Qualcomm Adreno 685, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1614.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 470 is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm Adreno 685 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 470 is a desktop card while Qualcomm Adreno 685 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 470
Radeon RX 470
Qualcomm Adreno 685
Adreno 685

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 4356 votes

Rate Radeon RX 470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 15 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 685 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.