Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs RX 470 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 470 Mobile with Radeon PRO WX 3100, including specs and performance data.
RX 470 Mobile outperforms PRO WX 3100 by a whopping 171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 313 | 571 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 10.22 | 4.95 |
| Power efficiency | 14.78 | 7.12 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | Ellesmere | Lexa |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 4 August 2016 (8 years ago) | 12 June 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549.99 | $199 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
RX 470 Mobile has 106% better value for money than PRO WX 3100.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 926 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1074 MHz | 1219 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 137.5 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.399 TFLOPS | 1.248 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 16 |
| TMUs | 128 | 32 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 145 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 35−40
+169%
| 13
−169%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 15.71
−2.7%
| 15.31
+2.7%
|
- RX 470 Mobile and PRO WX 3100 have nearly equal cost per frame in 1080p
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+138%
|
12−14
−138%
|
| ELDEN RING | 55−60
+200%
|
18−20
−200%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+170%
|
21−24
−170%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+138%
|
12−14
−138%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65
+130%
|
27−30
−130%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+192%
|
24−27
−192%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+227%
|
14−16
−227%
|
| Metro Exodus | 55−60
+195%
|
20−22
−195%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55
+148%
|
21−24
−148%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
+256%
|
18−20
−256%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+170%
|
21−24
−170%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+138%
|
12−14
−138%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
+147%
|
18−20
−147%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+104%
|
50−55
−104%
|
| ELDEN RING | 55−60
+200%
|
18−20
−200%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65
+130%
|
27−30
−130%
|
| Fortnite | 95−100
+292%
|
25
−292%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+192%
|
24−27
−192%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+227%
|
14−16
−227%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 65−70
+183%
|
21−24
−183%
|
| Metro Exodus | 55−60
+195%
|
20−22
−195%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 120−130
+129%
|
55−60
−129%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55
+148%
|
21−24
−148%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 55−60
+171%
|
21−24
−171%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
+256%
|
18−20
−256%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+170%
|
21−24
−170%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+138%
|
12−14
−138%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
+147%
|
18−20
−147%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+104%
|
50−55
−104%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65
+130%
|
27−30
−130%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+192%
|
24−27
−192%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+227%
|
14−16
−227%
|
| Metro Exodus | 55−60
+195%
|
20−22
−195%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 120−130
+129%
|
55−60
−129%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
+256%
|
18−20
−256%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55
+148%
|
21−24
−148%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+156%
|
16−18
−156%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 20−22
+186%
|
7−8
−186%
|
| ELDEN RING | 27−30
+263%
|
8−9
−263%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30
+263%
|
8−9
−263%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+334%
|
35−40
−334%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
+220%
|
5−6
−220%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+111%
|
9−10
−111%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
+243%
|
14−16
−243%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+254%
|
12−14
−254%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+190%
|
10−11
−190%
|
| Metro Exodus | 40−45
+356%
|
9−10
−356%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+150%
|
10−11
−150%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
+171%
|
16−18
−171%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
| ELDEN RING | 12−14
+225%
|
4−5
−225%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+110%
|
20−22
−110%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+82.4%
|
16−18
−82.4%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
+1200%
|
1−2
−1200%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
+184%
|
18−20
−184%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
+200%
|
4−5
−200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+82.4%
|
16−18
−82.4%
|
| Valorant | 16−18
+240%
|
5−6
−240%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+200%
|
6−7
−200%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
| Dota 2 | 60−65
+173%
|
21−24
−173%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+286%
|
7−8
−286%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16
+200%
|
5−6
−200%
|
This is how RX 470 Mobile and PRO WX 3100 compete in popular games:
- RX 470 Mobile is 169% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 470 Mobile is 1200% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RX 470 Mobile surpassed PRO WX 3100 in all 64 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 18.05 | 6.65 |
| Recency | 4 August 2016 | 12 June 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 65 Watt |
RX 470 Mobile has a 171.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
PRO WX 3100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and 30.8% lower power consumption.
The Radeon RX 470 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 3100 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon RX 470 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
