Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon RX 470 Mobile

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RX 470 Mobile
2016
8 GB GDDR5
18.85

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms Radeon RX 470 Mobile by 159% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking27457
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money41.2610.10
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 10 ProTU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 August 2016 (7 years ago)13 August 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549.99 $6,299
Current price$148 (0.3x MSRP)$3083 (0.5x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 470 Mobile has 309% better value for money than RTX 6000.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20484608
Core clock speed926 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed1206 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate137.5509.8
Floating-point performance4,399 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 470 Mobile and Quadro RTX 6000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed7000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDAno data7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−150%
75−80
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−158%
85−90
+158%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−154%
160−170
+154%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−145%
120−130
+145%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−150%
75−80
+150%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−140%
120−130
+140%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−155%
130−140
+155%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−146%
160−170
+146%
Hitman 3 50−55
−141%
130−140
+141%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−150%
100−105
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−158%
80−85
+158%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−150%
100−105
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−150%
90−95
+150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−158%
85−90
+158%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−154%
160−170
+154%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−145%
120−130
+145%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−150%
75−80
+150%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−140%
120−130
+140%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−155%
130−140
+155%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−146%
160−170
+146%
Hitman 3 50−55
−141%
130−140
+141%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−150%
100−105
+150%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−150%
75−80
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−158%
80−85
+158%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−150%
100−105
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−150%
90−95
+150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−158%
85−90
+158%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−154%
160−170
+154%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−150%
75−80
+150%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−140%
120−130
+140%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−155%
130−140
+155%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−146%
160−170
+146%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−150%
90−95
+150%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−150%
70−75
+150%
Hitman 3 30−33
−150%
75−80
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−140%
60−65
+140%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−158%
80−85
+158%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−150%
90−95
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−150%
95−100
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Hitman 3 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−141%
65−70
+141%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 18.85 48.73
Recency 4 August 2016 13 August 2018
Cost $549.99 $6299
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 260 Watt

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 470 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 470 Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile
Radeon RX 470 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 31 vote

Rate Radeon RX 470 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 122 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.