Quadro 600 vs Radeon RX 460

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 460 with Quadro 600, including specs and performance data.

RX 460
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
9.88
+678%

RX 460 outperforms 600 by a whopping 678% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4481035
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.120.16
Power efficiency9.652.33
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameBaffinGF108
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date8 August 2016 (8 years ago)13 December 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86 $179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 460 has 600% better value for money than Quadro 600.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores89696
Core clock speed1090 MHz640 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate67.2010.24
Floating-point processing power2.15 TFLOPS0.2458 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs5616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Length170 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 460 9.88
+678%
Quadro 600 1.27

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 460 4102
+678%
Quadro 600 527

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD41
+720%
5−6
−720%
1440p50
+733%
6−7
−733%
4K20
+900%
2−3
−900%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.10
+1607%
35.80
−1607%
1440p1.72
+1634%
29.83
−1634%
4K4.30
+1981%
89.50
−1981%
  • RX 460 has 1607% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 460 has 1634% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 460 has 1981% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+783%
6−7
−783%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+780%
5−6
−780%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+783%
6−7
−783%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Far Cry 5 40
+700%
5−6
−700%
Fortnite 116
+729%
14−16
−729%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+714%
7−8
−714%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 36
+800%
4−5
−800%
Valorant 90−95
+683%
12−14
−683%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+780%
5−6
−780%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+783%
6−7
−783%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+728%
18−20
−728%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Dota 2 70−75
+689%
9−10
−689%
Far Cry 5 37
+825%
4−5
−825%
Fortnite 39
+680%
5−6
−680%
Forza Horizon 4 54
+800%
6−7
−800%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+775%
4−5
−775%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Metro Exodus 21
+950%
2−3
−950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 28
+833%
3−4
−833%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+825%
4−5
−825%
Valorant 90−95
+683%
12−14
−683%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+780%
5−6
−780%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Dota 2 70−75
+689%
9−10
−689%
Far Cry 5 34
+750%
4−5
−750%
Forza Horizon 4 41
+720%
5−6
−720%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20
+900%
2−3
−900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Valorant 90−95
+683%
12−14
−683%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 31
+933%
3−4
−933%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+744%
9−10
−744%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+750%
6−7
−750%
Valorant 110−120
+693%
14−16
−693%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 0−1
Metro Exodus 6−7 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Valorant 50−55
+767%
6−7
−767%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%
Far Cry 5 11
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

This is how RX 460 and Quadro 600 compete in popular games:

  • RX 460 is 720% faster in 1080p
  • RX 460 is 733% faster in 1440p
  • RX 460 is 900% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.88 1.27
Recency 8 August 2016 13 December 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 40 Watt

RX 460 has a 678% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro 600, on the other hand, has 87.5% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 460 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 460 is a desktop card while Quadro 600 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 460
Radeon RX 460
NVIDIA Quadro 600
Quadro 600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1078 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 422 votes

Rate Quadro 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 460 or Quadro 600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.