GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs Radeon R9 M485X

Place in the ranking	470	190
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.62	18.22
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Amethyst	TU106
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 May 2016 (8 years ago)	29 January 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	1920
Core clock speed	723 MHz	960 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	92.54	144.0
Floating-point processing power	2.961 TFLOPS	4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	48
TMUs	128	120
Tensor Cores	no data	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.3	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	30−35 −247%	104 +247%
1440p	18−21 −267%	66 +267%
4K	12−14 −250%	42 +250%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −247%	55−60 +247%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −232%	60−65 +232%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −190%	90 +190%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −247%	55−60 +247%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −63.2%	31 +63.2%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −292%	149 +292%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −229%	75−80 +229%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −215%	82 +215%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −300%	100 +300%
Valorant	35−40 −289%	140 +289%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −242%	106 +242%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −247%	55−60 +247%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −26.3%	24 +26.3%
Dota 2	30−35 −191%	99 +191%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −79.5%	70 +79.5%
Fortnite	55−60 −157%	140−150 +157%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −224%	123 +224%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −229%	75−80 +229%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −165%	90 +165%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −135%	61 +135%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −234%	247 +234%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −80%	45 +80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −252%	100−110 +252%
Valorant	35−40 −125%	81 +125%
World of Tanks	130−140 −97.1%	270−280 +97.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −145%	76 +145%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −247%	55−60 +247%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −10.5%	21 +10.5%
Dota 2	30−35 −229%	112 +229%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −213%	122 +213%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −182%	107 +182%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −229%	75−80 +229%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −13.5%	84 +13.5%
Valorant	35−40 −242%	123 +242%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	12−14 −342%	50−55 +342%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 −315%	50−55 +315%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −146%	140−150 +146%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −263%	29 +263%
World of Tanks	65−70 −190%	190−200 +190%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −239%	61 +239%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −100%	14 +100%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −370%	90−95 +370%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −300%	80−85 +300%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −250%	45−50 +250%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −283%	65−70 +283%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −269%	45−50 +269%
Valorant	24−27 −263%	87 +263%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Dota 2	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −250%	98 +250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −233%	20 +233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −288%	31 +288%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6 +100%
Dota 2	20−22 −335%	87 +335%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −282%	40−45 +282%
Fortnite	10−11 −290%	39 +290%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −300%	45−50 +300%
Forza Horizon 5	7−8 −286%	27−30 +286%
Valorant	9−10 −356%	41 +356%

This is how R9 M485X and RTX 2060 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 Mobile is 247% faster in 1080p
RTX 2060 Mobile is 267% faster in 1440p
RTX 2060 Mobile is 250% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2060 Mobile is 380% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 2060 Mobile surpassed R9 M485X in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.09	29.06
Recency	15 May 2016	29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	115 Watt

R9 M485X has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 2060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 219.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 117.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M485X in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.