Radeon R6 (Kaveri) vs R9 M395X
Aggregated performance score
R9 M395X outperforms R6 (Kaveri) by a whopping 650% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 354 | 879 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | GCN 3 (2014−2016) | GCN 1.1 (2014) |
GPU code name | Amethyst XT | Kaveri |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 October 2014 (9 years ago) | 4 June 2014 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 533 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 654 MHz |
Number of transistors | 5,000 million | 2410 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | no data |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 | no data |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon R9 M395X and Radeon R6 (Kaveri) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | no data |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | no data |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Eyefinity | 1 | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
AppAcceleration | - | no data |
Enduro | - | no data |
FreeSync | 1 | no data |
HD3D | + | no data |
PowerTune | + | no data |
DualGraphics | 1 | no data |
TrueAudio | + | no data |
ZeroCore | + | no data |
Switchable graphics | 1 | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 (FL 12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
OpenCL | Not Listed | no data |
Mantle | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
R9 M395X outperforms R6 (Kaveri) by 650% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
R9 M395X outperforms R6 (Kaveri) by 652% in Passmark.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
R9 M395X outperforms R6 (Kaveri) by 928% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 70−75
+600%
| 10
−600%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+425%
|
4−5
−425%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
+2700%
|
1−2
−2700%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24
+1000%
|
2−3
−1000%
|
Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+2200%
|
2−3
−2200%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
+250%
|
10−11
−250%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+425%
|
4−5
−425%
|
Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+3400%
|
1−2
−3400%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 35−40 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+1467%
|
3−4
−1467%
|
Hitman 3 | 35−40
+1100%
|
3−4
−1100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 27−30
+1300%
|
2−3
−1300%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 21−24
+475%
|
4−5
−475%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 27−30
+250%
|
8−9
−250%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 24−27
+733%
|
3−4
−733%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
+2700%
|
1−2
−2700%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24
+1000%
|
2−3
−1000%
|
Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+2200%
|
2−3
−2200%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
+250%
|
10−11
−250%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+425%
|
4−5
−425%
|
Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+3400%
|
1−2
−3400%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 35−40 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+1467%
|
3−4
−1467%
|
Hitman 3 | 35−40
+1100%
|
3−4
−1100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 27−30
+1300%
|
2−3
−1300%
|
Metro Exodus | 21−24
+950%
|
2−3
−950%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 21−24
+475%
|
4−5
−475%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 27−30
+250%
|
8−9
−250%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+460%
|
5−6
−460%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 24−27
+733%
|
3−4
−733%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
+2700%
|
1−2
−2700%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24
+1000%
|
2−3
−1000%
|
Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+2200%
|
2−3
−2200%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+425%
|
4−5
−425%
|
Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+3400%
|
1−2
−3400%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 35−40 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+1467%
|
3−4
−1467%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+460%
|
5−6
−460%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 24−27
+733%
|
3−4
−733%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 18−20
+375%
|
4−5
−375%
|
Hitman 3 | 21−24
+425%
|
4−5
−425%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 18−20
+111%
|
9−10
−111%
|
Metro Exodus | 12−14
+1100%
|
1−2
−1100%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 16−18
+240%
|
5−6
−240%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 12−14
+1200%
|
1−2
−1200%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+800%
|
3−4
−800%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+633%
|
3−4
−633%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
+700%
|
3−4
−700%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+767%
|
3−4
−767%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+1200%
|
1−2
−1200%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
Hitman 3 | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
+42.9%
|
7−8
−42.9%
|
Metro Exodus | 6−7 | 0−1 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+1100%
|
1−2
−1100%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 8−9 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 6−7 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+1200%
|
1−2
−1200%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 10−12
+267%
|
3−4
−267%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 12−14
+160%
|
5−6
−160%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+800%
|
2−3
−800%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6 | 0−1 |
This is how R9 M395X and R6 (Kaveri) compete in popular games:
- R9 M395X is 600% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the R9 M395X is 3400% faster than the R6 (Kaveri).
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, R9 M395X surpassed R6 (Kaveri) in all 41 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 13.42 | 1.79 |
Recency | 16 October 2014 | 4 June 2014 |
The Radeon R9 M395X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 (Kaveri) in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.